IBJNews

Former Indy Chamber prez scores consulting work

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Scott Miller, who stepped down Friday as president of the Indy Chamber, started work this week as a consultant for two local startups.

Miller left the chamber after less than two years as president to pursue more entrepreneurial interests. As a consultant, he will work with Indianapolis-based 3D Parts Manufacturing and an undisclosed construction company.

He will provide general business advice for both firms as they get off the ground. “Those two engagements are going to keep me fairly busy for the next several months,” Miller said.

Both consultation contracts are open-ended. “I’ll be there as long as they need me,” Miller said. “Hopefully that will be a long time.”

In the meantime, the chamber has begun taking applications for Miller’s replacement.

Greg Fennig, a vice president for Indianapolis Power & Light Co. and chair of the chamber’s search committee, said the organization expects to have a new president selected by the end of July.

Candidates from across the country have submitted applications, Fennig said, but the “vast majority” of them have been from the Indianapolis area.

Miller arrived at the chamber in October 2011 to succeed Roland Dorson as president. Dorson has since taken a job leading a tech startup.

One of Miller’s clients, 3D Parts Manufacturing, launched in January. Company co-founder Kim Brand chairs the board of directors for the Business Ownership Initiative, which is part of the Indy Chamber.

Brand, who knew Miller through their roles with the chamber, recruited Miller after he announced his intention to resign from from the chamber in April.

Miller will help with startup chores as basic as developing a business plan, Brand said.

Miller declined to discuss his second client, because the company has not publicly announced his contract.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT