IBJNews

Fort Ben home, condos fail to sell at auction

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The former home of the commanding general at Fort Benjamin Harrison and four condominiums at the old Army base failed to sell at an auction.

Reserve bids were not met on any of the homes during the June 17 auction, but the seller continues to work with potential buyers for the general's house and two of the condos, said Mike Couch, an agent with Sycamore Group Realty who has the condos listed.

The condos are among 48 units in three historic buildings redeveloped by VLB & Associates, a development firm owned by Virginia L. Basham, who bought the properties in 1996, shortly after the federal government closed Fort Ben.

The condos are all two- and three-bedroom units and range in size from 2,050 to 2,800 square feet. They had been listed for between $290,000 and $350,000. All but four of the first 32 units that were developed sold before the real estate market collapsed last year.

The house and the condominium buildings are on Lawton Loop, the street in the old Army fort where enlisted men’s barracks were located. The barracks buildings, which were built between 1901 and 1906, have historic details that Basham went to great lengths to preserve as they were converted to condos.

The 8,100-square-foot commanding general’s home had been converted into three apartments before Basham bought it and restored it to its original floor plan in the late 1990s. The three-story, 1903 home was the St. Margaret’s Guild Decorator’s Show Home in 1999. Basham intended to move into it but never did.

It was listed at one time for more than $1 million but was most recently listed at $792,000.

IBJ first reported on the auction in a story on June 8.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT