HETRICK: Four things considered at the mayoral ballot box

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Bruce Hetrick

As a political science major, I learned about the theory and practice of obtaining and exercising power.

I read Hobbes and Machiavelli, Jefferson and Madison, Woodward, Bernstein and Theodore White.

I pored over the history of political parties, analyzed voter demographics, and debated issues du jour.

But it was Robert Caro’s “The Power Broker” that opened my eyes. While I’ve never lost my belief that government and governmental leaders can do good—and that most want to do so—those 1,344 pages left me ever alert to behind-the-scenes machinations that influence money, public policy and elections.

When I went to work in government—for both Republican and Democratic administrations—I saw firsthand how the game is played. As a campaign donor, volunteer, adviser and “political junkie,” I’ve learned even more.

Here are four stories to consider at the mayoral ballot box in November.

You can’t blame your predecessor forever.

At every level, newly elected officials blame their problems on those who preceded them.

They say, “We inherited a mess,” or, “My predecessor spent all the money,” or, “We first had to right the wrongs and turn the Titanic.”

But there’s a statute of limitations on this strategy. Two years in, new leaders have had time to build their teams and ensure their philosophies and budgets are driving results.

Woe to re-election candidates who are still pummeling the previous paradigm for all their problems.

The gift of public improvements won’t keep on giving.

During my first local-government gig, I learned about stashing cash and stockpiling public improvements.

In essence, for the first 2-1/2 years of an administration, you fill the potholes, patrol the streets, and answer the action line—but not much more.

Then, in the last 15 months before re-election, you pave roads, pour curbs and build everything possible. And all these projects are miraculously finished and the ribbons cut in the final three weeks before Election Day.

In Indianapolis, this year’s build-a-thon is even bigger, because it’s multiplied tenfold by dollars from the long-term lease of parking meters and the water company sale to Citizens Energy.

But remember: If we’re spending years’ worth of public improvement money now, whoever’s mayor will be spending less later.

Mayors drive the public agenda, even when they aren’t nominally in charge.

In the Indianapolis mayoral race this year, education has become a big issue. Our urban schools are failing and the candidates are debating how, and whether, the mayor should help.

Years ago, I helped elect an instant majority to the Hartford, Conn., school board. They struggled to make the improvements they’d hoped to make. Eventually, the state of Connecticut had to take over the entire system, assigning the schools to a private operator (sound familiar?).

I asked my friend Ted Carroll, now a former school board member, how that worked out. His reply is telling:

“I supported the takeover in Hartford,” he said, “reasoning that it made sense to tie the political fortunes of the governor and legislative leaders to the success of the schools. Normally, we only tie school success to the political fortunes of school board members—who have so much less power.

“In Hartford, we saw an infusion of new money, the creation of more student-centered work rules, and more civil school board meetings.

“That said, we never saw much actual improvement until the district returned to school system control, hired a reform-minded superintendent and elected a mayor who provided enough political muscle to get the reforms through (emphasis mine).

“State control of Indiana schools, then, may be an important transition step, but probably not the final step, if Hartford’s example is any indication.”

Don’t believe every promise.

In October 2007, I e-mailed candidate Greg Ballard to ask whether he’d support a smoke-free workplace law that covers all workers, including those in bowling alleys, bars and private clubs.

His quick, personal reply impressed me.

“I can assure you,” Ballard said, “that I am a supporter of the smokefree workplace. Second-hand smoke is a proven health hazard and I would support any legislation to limit the impact of second-hand smoke.”

Two years later, when that legislation was being considered by the City-County Council, I wrote Mayor Ballard again to ask the same question.

I got a canned response from “Constituent Services.”

It said, “Mayor Ballard wants to strike a balance between the rights and liberties of businesses and citizens and the public’s health. Since the Proposal was announced, Mayor Ballard and his Administration have taken input and continue to gather data in efforts of reaching a conclusive position.”

Mayor Ballard subsequently threatened to veto the bill, said Indianapolis “isn’t ready” for such a law, and said that service employees in smoky environments don’t count because they’re “transients.”

As the old political anthem says: “Promises, promises, I’m all through with promises, promises now.”•


Hetrick is an Indianapolis-based writer, speaker and public relations consultant. His column appears twice a month. He can be reached at bhetrick@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...