IBJNews

Franciscan among Medicare's first accountable care groups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Franciscan Alliance’s Indianapolis-area hospitals have been named one of the nation’s first 32 accountable care organizations, federal Medicare officials announced Monday.

Accountable care organizations, or ACOs, are one of the key elements of the 2010 health care overhaul designed to rein in galloping increases in health care spending. Hospitals in Indiana have spoken positively about the concept, but only Franciscan Alliance has applied and won admission to the program.

Beginning on Jan. 1, Franciscan will take responsibility for providing high-quality care for 22,000 Medicare patients in central Indiana. If it also spends less money than in the past caring for those patients, Medicare will give some of those savings back to Franciscan as a bonus payment. But if Franciscan spends more money than before, it will have some of its Medicare payments reduced.

The Pioneer ACO program pledges Franciscan to enter similar relationships with other health plans. And in the third year of the program, Medicare could give Franciscan a per-patient payment for a year’s worth of care. Franciscan then would bear the risk of caring for its patients for that amount.

Those methods of payment differ radically from Medicare's current practice, which is simply to pay doctors and hospitals a pre-determined fee for every procedure they perform. That practice is almost universally cited as a reason health care spending rises significantly faster than overall inflation.

“From an industry perspective, the ACO model encourages organizations such as hospitals, physician practices, and other healthcare providers to collaborate closely, thus bringing down the overall costs of medical care,” Jennifer Westfall, executive director of the Franciscan Alliance ACO, said in a prepared statement.

Franciscan’s ACO initially will include hospitals in Beech Grove, Indianapolis and Mooresville, as well as more than 700 physicians. Of those doctors, 180 are employed by Franciscan and the rest, while independent, have agreed to work together to coordinate patient care as part of the ACO.

Some of Franciscan Alliance’s 11 other hospitals may join the ACO effort at a later time, said Joe Stuteville, a spokesman for Mishawaka-based Franciscan Alliance.

The federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services named ACOs in 18 states Monday. Collectively, they will manage care for 860,000 patients. Over five years, CMS estimates, these ACOs could achieve savings of $1.1 billion.

“These Pioneer ACOs represent our nation’s leaders in health systems innovation, providing highly coordinated care for patients at lower costs,” said Marilyn Tavenner, acting administrator of Medicare, in a prepared statement.

Other hospital systems participating in the Pioneer ACO program include Minneapolis-based Allina Hospitals & Clinics, Boston-based Partners Healthcare, and the University of Michigan Health System.

The Pioneer ACO program is distinct from the Medicare Shared Savings program created by the 2010 health law. Rather, it is a test of a particular payment method using the ACO concept. Medicare is trying to work out terms of the ACO and shared savings concepts to entice enough hospitals to participate. Some hospitals have been reluctant to sign up because the program requires significant investments and offers uncertain rewards.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Patient committed
    Other hospital networks have applied but have not been asked to be in the pilot ACO
  • Win?
    "only Franciscan Alliance has applied and won admission to the program"

    Not sure I'd call that a "win" at all.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

    2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

    3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

    4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

    5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.

    ADVERTISEMENT