IBJNews

Franciscan among Medicare's first accountable care groups

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Franciscan Alliance’s Indianapolis-area hospitals have been named one of the nation’s first 32 accountable care organizations, federal Medicare officials announced Monday.

Accountable care organizations, or ACOs, are one of the key elements of the 2010 health care overhaul designed to rein in galloping increases in health care spending. Hospitals in Indiana have spoken positively about the concept, but only Franciscan Alliance has applied and won admission to the program.

Beginning on Jan. 1, Franciscan will take responsibility for providing high-quality care for 22,000 Medicare patients in central Indiana. If it also spends less money than in the past caring for those patients, Medicare will give some of those savings back to Franciscan as a bonus payment. But if Franciscan spends more money than before, it will have some of its Medicare payments reduced.

The Pioneer ACO program pledges Franciscan to enter similar relationships with other health plans. And in the third year of the program, Medicare could give Franciscan a per-patient payment for a year’s worth of care. Franciscan then would bear the risk of caring for its patients for that amount.

Those methods of payment differ radically from Medicare's current practice, which is simply to pay doctors and hospitals a pre-determined fee for every procedure they perform. That practice is almost universally cited as a reason health care spending rises significantly faster than overall inflation.

“From an industry perspective, the ACO model encourages organizations such as hospitals, physician practices, and other healthcare providers to collaborate closely, thus bringing down the overall costs of medical care,” Jennifer Westfall, executive director of the Franciscan Alliance ACO, said in a prepared statement.

Franciscan’s ACO initially will include hospitals in Beech Grove, Indianapolis and Mooresville, as well as more than 700 physicians. Of those doctors, 180 are employed by Franciscan and the rest, while independent, have agreed to work together to coordinate patient care as part of the ACO.

Some of Franciscan Alliance’s 11 other hospitals may join the ACO effort at a later time, said Joe Stuteville, a spokesman for Mishawaka-based Franciscan Alliance.

The federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services named ACOs in 18 states Monday. Collectively, they will manage care for 860,000 patients. Over five years, CMS estimates, these ACOs could achieve savings of $1.1 billion.

“These Pioneer ACOs represent our nation’s leaders in health systems innovation, providing highly coordinated care for patients at lower costs,” said Marilyn Tavenner, acting administrator of Medicare, in a prepared statement.

Other hospital systems participating in the Pioneer ACO program include Minneapolis-based Allina Hospitals & Clinics, Boston-based Partners Healthcare, and the University of Michigan Health System.

The Pioneer ACO program is distinct from the Medicare Shared Savings program created by the 2010 health law. Rather, it is a test of a particular payment method using the ACO concept. Medicare is trying to work out terms of the ACO and shared savings concepts to entice enough hospitals to participate. Some hospitals have been reluctant to sign up because the program requires significant investments and offers uncertain rewards.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Patient committed
    Other hospital networks have applied but have not been asked to be in the pilot ACO
  • Win?
    "only Franciscan Alliance has applied and won admission to the program"

    Not sure I'd call that a "win" at all.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

    2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

    3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

    4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

    5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

    ADVERTISEMENT