Local attorney sues Fundex over game royalties

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A local lawyer who created the game “Chronology” is accusing Fundex Games Ltd. of trademark infringement.

Jane Ruemmele, a Marion County public defender, filed suit March 24 in U.S. District Court of southern Indiana. The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, trademark infringement, use of a counterfeit mark, unfair competition, copyright infringement, trademark dilution and forgery.

Ruemmele is seeking damages, plus a judgment for the return or destruction of all products bearing the Chronology trademark.

Fundex is a family-owned company based in Plainfield that sells licensed games, plus standard games such as checkers and chess. One of its top sellers is "Phase 10," a variation on rummy. The company is also defending a trademark-infringement suit from "Phase 10" creator Kenneth Johnson of Michigan.

An attorney for Fundex, Daniel Lueders of Woodard Emhardt Moritary McNett & Henry in Indianapolis, did not return a phone call seeking comment on the Ruemmele case.

In Chronology, players try to place historical events and inventions in their proper place in time. The first player to accumulate 10 cards in calendar sequence wins. Ruemmele holds the trademark and copyright to the game, which she first licensed in 1995.

Fundex acquired the licensing rights to “Chronology” in October of 2007 with the purchase of Great American Puzzle Factory, according to the lawsuit. The deal that Ruemmele struck with Great American in 1995 provides her royalty payments of 6 percent of net sales. The rate rises to 8 percent after the first 100,000 games are sold.

“Fundex has sold numerous units of the card game since its acquisition of Great American,” the lawsuit alleges, but the company has provided no royalty statements or payments since October 2008.

Ruemmele also believes the payments Fundex made up to that point were less than required under the license agreement.

The lawsuit says Ruemmele attempted to work with Fundex to extend the license agreement past an expiration date of March 31, 2008, or to strike a new deal. “However, Fundex continually refused to return calls or correspondence from Ruemmele or her attorney while Fundex continued to sell and market the card game.”

Jonathan Polak, the Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP attorney representing Ruemmele, said his client isn’t sure exactly how many copies of Chronology have been sold by Fundex—that’s why she’s seeking an audit. The contract with Great American gave Ruemmele the right to inspect company sales records.  

Polak wouldn't say how much “Chronology” had earned before Fundex acquired the game.

Ruemmele’s relationship with Great American, formerly based in Connecticut, suggests the game was successful.

Ruemmele and Great American renewed the contract in 2000 and again on Oct. 15, 2007, shortly before the sale to Fundex.

Great American also paid Ruemmele an annual, guaranteed advance of $1,000, according to the license contract.


  • Fundex Games Patent Infringement
    Fundex Games CEO is the nephew of Senator Richard Lugar. Their business philosophy is to take other peoples ideas and copy and sell. Do it cheaply with their contacts in in Asia. They are being sued by multiple companies for patent infringement and license contracts. They even copied QuoitFactory.com game and called it Fundex Ringers. Phase 10 creator is suing and so it this guy. What a horrible company that needs to go out of business. Disgrace to American business.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing