IBJOpinion

GARNER: Multifamily housing is not the enemy

Sanford Garner
September 18, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Sanford GarnerIt would be easy to blame the economy for our blighted urban neighborhoods. True, these tough economic times have led to more vacant and foreclosed houses than we can count. But the key to revitalizing a neighborhood stretches far beyond boarded-up houses. If we want to see positive changes in our neighborhoods, and attract businesses, we have to be willing to change our thinking.

For years, people in neighborhoods in and around downtown have said they want more stores. They want Target or Meijer or Trader Joe’s. They want more restaurants, dry cleaners and grocery stores. Yes, it would be great not to have to drive to the suburbs to grocery shop. But it’s not just the economy preventing stores from coming to near-downtown neighborhoods. Stores aren’t going to invest in a neighborhood that doesn’t have the kind of density, income, education level or traffic they need to be profitable.

There are several near-downtown neighborhoods looking at ways to revitalize, such as the area around 20th Street and the Monon Trail, the St. Clair Place neighborhood and the King Park area. While residents typically embrace the idea of revitalization, they, too, often get in the mind-set that the only way to revitalize is to raze abandoned houses, build new ones, and bring in some retail. If only it were that easy.

The challenge of revitalizing an urban community is all about balance. As residents clamor for more retail, they have to understand that the only way to accomplish it is to increase the density of the area. One sure way to accomplish that is multifamily housing, whether that’s apartments, duplexes, townhomes or a combination.

Whoa. Residents speak out about that. They don’t want an apartment complex in their neighborhood. Somehow apartments have gotten a bad rap. There’s an impression that all apartment complexes are bad. Residents worry that a townhome building is going to be 20 stories high and look out of place. But not all townhomes are high-rises; we can point to a host of successful townhomes around the city that blend into the surroundings. Again, this is about balance.

If Indianapolis neighborhoods have a chance of attracting more retail—whether it’s a Target or an independently owned business—we have to figure out how to bring balance, so there is enough density, traffic and buying power to make that feasible.

We can’t give up. Look at Fall Creek Place. The development of work-live spaces, such as Douglas Pointe at Delaware and 25th streets, helped provide the mechanism to bring businesses to a community setting. And, because of it, we have new treasures such as Goose the Market, a hair salon and yoga studios. There is enough density from the redeveloped Fall Creek Place neighborhood and enough buying power in the area to make it attractive to businesses. The same has happened along Massachusetts Avenue, where higher-density properties have led to increased commercial development.

In the area around 20th Street and the Monon, which was part of a study by a national team from the American Institute of Architects, the density is about 140 people per block. Retailers can’t survive with density that low. It’s going to have to be at least twice that amount before a retailer will even think of investing in the neighborhood.

Neighborhoods have to be willing to embrace the idea that multifamily facilities don’t have to hinder a community’s image; rather, they can be the catalyst for helping bring improved amenities to an area. We can revitalize our neighborhoods, recruit the type of services and retailers our residents are seeking, and improve the quality of life, if we’re willing to think broadly and work together, even in these tough economic times.•

__________

Garner is president and founder of the Indianapolis architecture firm A2SO4, is the incoming president of the National Association of Minority Architects, and serves on a national urban sustainable design committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT