IBJNews

Girl Scouts of Central Indiana moving to new headquarters

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

Girl Scouts of Central Indiana plans to move its headquarters and 63 employees this summer from 1800 N. Meridian St. to the Waterfront Office Park on the northwest side at interstates 465 and 74.

CEO Deborah Hearn Smith said the move will eventually bring a cost savings, but it has other benefits. The I-465 location will be more convenient to employees and volunteers traveling to headquarters from throughout a 45-county area. The office park also offers adjacent parking, whereas volunteers now have to dodge traffic crossing Meridian Street. Smith said she hasn’t yet signed the lease at Waterfront. The current lease expires Aug. 30.
 

OTB Philanthropy Girl Scouts of Central Indiana plans to vacate its headquarters at 1800 N. Meridian St. this summer. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

Girl Scouts realigned and consolidated territories in 2007. The central Indiana council was created from five free-standing districts, plus parts of two others. It has a current budget of $9.2 million, which includes seven regional offices.

Smith said most of the consolidation is complete, except for the pending sale of four of nine camps. The council plans to sell camps Hawthorne Trails, Treaty Line, Windigo and Munsee. Hawthorne Trails is in Boone County, north of Wolf Run Golf Club and Indianapolis Executive Airport.

Smith said she hasn’t yet signed a contract with a broker or determined listing prices. Any savings on operating costs will be redirected to the five remaining camps, where Smith said she plans to add staff and programs.

“We’re looking at, over the next five years, having a bigger budget, not a smaller one,” she said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT