IBJNews

Chairman Glasscock retiring from WellPoint board

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

WellPoint Inc. CEO Angela Braly will chair the Indianapolis-based firm’s board of directors following the March 1 retirement of Larry C. Glasscock, who built the company into the nation's largest health insurer.

The company announced Glasscock’s decision to leave the board early Wednesday.

Glasscock, 61, gave up the president and CEO’s position in June 2007, citing undisclosed“family reasons.” He had served as CEO and president since 1999 and chairman since November 2005. Under his leadership, the company grew from $6 billion in revenue to more than $60 billion in revenue.

"Larry has served WellPoint with great distinction through the years, and we are enormously thankful for his contributions to the company, both as chairman and, before that, as CEO,” independent director William H.T. Bush said in a statement issued on behalf of the board.

Braly, 48, was the obvious choice to succeed Glasscock, Bush said, adding that she “personifies WellPoint's core values in every way, and her dynamic leadership style engages and inspires confidence.”

Before ascending to her current position, Braly served two years as an executive vice president. Before that, she was the president and CEO of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Missouri.

In a statement, Glasscock said the time was right for him to retire.

"At this point, my work here is accomplished and there is one individual most capable of leading WellPoint into the future: Angela Braly," he said. "Angela is a leader of outstanding talent, dedication and vision. I wish her, and all the men and women of WellPoint, the best of success."

Glasscock joined WellPoint predecessor Anthem Insurance in 1998. Under his leadership, the company went public in 2001—a move that made possible the merger three years later of Indianapolis-based Anthem and California-based WellPoint Health Networks Inc. The company kept the WellPoint name but made Indianapolis its headquarters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT