IBJNews

Governor backs alternative business tax cut

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence threw his support behind House Republicans' watered-down business tax proposal Tuesday amid outcry from local leaders over the potential to damage their already cash-strapped budgets.

Pence originally sought the elimination of the state's business personal property tax, which is levied on business equipment, when he announced his 2014 legislative agenda last month. But Chris Atkins, director of the Office of Management and Budget, told members of the House Ways and Means Committee that the governor would back an alternative measure crafted by House Republican leaders.

"I'm here with you to share the governor's support for House Bill 1001," Atkins said. "He believes that while we made substantial progress on our tax climate in recent years, the business personal property tax remains an outlier that we need to deal with if we're truly going to attract jobs and investment moving forward."

The announcement marks one of the first clear signs of what the governor is seeking on an issue that's been at the center of his legislative agenda.

Pence wrote in his 2014 policy "roadmap" that he wanted to "eliminate the business personal property tax to spur new investment." But as opposition among local leaders grew, Pence began saying he would support a "phase-out" matched with undefined aid for localities.

Absent a proposal from Pence, Republican legislative leaders crafted their own proposals. House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, announced the chamber's plan would give counties the option to eliminate the tax on all new business equipment.

Senate Republican leaders, including the chairs of the tax and budget committees, submitted their own plan that would eliminate the personal property tax for small businesses and cut the corporate income tax. Atkins made no mention of the Senate plan on Tuesday.

The House bill's author, Rep. Eric Turner, R-Cicero, called the business tax one of the worst for the economy because it stalls the type of business growth and expansion lawmakers should encourage.

"The problem with the business personal property tax is it taxes capital investment," he said.

Chad Pittman, executive vice president for the semi-private Indiana Economic Development Corp., said the state is at a disadvantage when competing for jobs with neighboring states such as Illinois, which have eliminated the tax.

But the complete elimination of the tax, which is used to fill local coffers, came with a $1 billion price tag and no clear way to cover the budget holes it would create at the local level.

A parade of Indiana mayors told the panel those states found ways to refund localities the money lost without the tax. Evansville Mayor Lloyd Winnecke, a Republican, noted that a referendum being placed before Michigan voters also provides for replacement funding from the state.

"We hear that surrounding states have eliminated the business personal property tax, but let's not leave out this one important piece of the question," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Be so glad when Pence is gone.
    Just to not let him put his name in for president.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I'm a CPA who works with a wide range of companies (through my firm K.B.Parrish & Co.); however, we work with quite a few car dealerships, so I'm fairly interested in Fatwin (mentioned in the article). Does anyone have much information on that, or a link to such information? Thanks.

  2. Historically high long-term unemployment, unprecedented labor market slack and the loss of human capital should not be accepted as "the economy at work [and] what is supposed to happen" and is certainly not raising wages in Indiana. See Chicago Fed Reserve: goo.gl/IJ4JhQ Also, here's our research on Work Sharing and our support testimony at yesterday's hearing: goo.gl/NhC9W4

  3. I am always curious why teachers don't believe in accountability. It's the only profession in the world that things they are better than everyone else. It's really a shame.

  4. It's not often in Indiana that people from both major political parties and from both labor and business groups come together to endorse a proposal. I really think this is going to help create a more flexible labor force, which is what businesses claim to need, while also reducing outright layoffs, and mitigating the impact of salary/wage reductions, both of which have been highlighted as important issues affecting Hoosier workers. Like many other public policies, I'm sure that this one will, over time, be tweaked and changed as needed to meet Indiana's needs. But when you have such broad agreement, why not give this a try?

  5. I could not agree more with Ben's statement. Every time I look at my unemployment insurance rate, "irritated" hardly describes my sentiment. We are talking about a surplus of funds, and possibly refunding that, why, so we can say we did it and get a notch in our political belt? This is real money, to real companies, large and small. The impact is felt across the board; in the spending of the company, the hiring (or lack thereof due to higher insurance costs), as well as in the personal spending of the owners of a smaller company.

ADVERTISEMENT