IBJNews

Governor signs bill limiting specialty license plates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A plan overhauling Indiana's specialty auto license plate system and requiring all groups with plates to sell 500 a year has been signed into law by Gov. Mike Pence.

The bill approved by lawmakers creates an eight-member bipartisan commission to review requests from not-for-profit groups seeking specialty plates. The panel will check financial reports at least once a decade on how the groups are spending their plate proceeds.

The bill sets a limit of 150 specialty plates. A legislative report shows that 17 of the 92 specialty plates sold during the past two years fell short of selling the minimum 500 plates a year.

Supporters say the new rules are meant to keep a handle on the number of specialty plates and ensure the money is spent appropriately.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Help Governor!
    So where are the jobs? Maybe we can put everyone to work making license plates. Oops, Sorry! We use criminals for license plate production. Oh well, the legislature and the governor are too busy saving us from ourselves to worry about jobs. I guess we could Wander Indiana For Jobs!
  • One Plate
    Remember when you could easily identify what state a vehicle was from because each state had one design? If I were in law enforcement, I'd be advocating for one design per state. (Of course, I'd also lobby for requiring Indiana vehicles to have two license plates like most other states require.) If you want to support something, make a donation and buy a bumper sticker. I suppose I'm a little old-fashioned that way.
  • Nothing has changed
    The rules were always that 500 plates had to be sold each year. Apparently, the enforcement of that rule was lacking- As a not for profit, I gathered 800 signatures from citizens that would buy our proposed plate and we were denied by the government. They stated that the Police were concerned that there are already too many specialty plates in this state and that law enforcement no longer recognized all of the different ones therefore they didn't wish to grant any additional plates being placed into the marketplace. I guess the PD wasn't asked this time around OR the gov't doesn't care what they had to say.
  • Point on
    What an embarrassment that the indiana government is wasting it's time on items like this.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. JK, Thanks for your comments. I suppose your question of whether or not a more expensive but potentially better MRI quality is worth it depends upon whom you ask. If a radiologist misses a significant problem because of imaging quality issues, then maybe the extra cost would have been worth it. That is something a patient has to decide for him/herself. That being said, I too want more fair and competitive pricing and transparency from hospitals!

  2. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  3. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  4. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  5. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

ADVERTISEMENT