IBJNews

Governor wants revamped teacher evaluations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Workers who dread their annual job performance reviews might feel better about the process if they knew 99 percent of employees were rated effective. It's an unlikely scenario for many companies, but for Indiana teachers it's a reality that could soon be coming to an end.

Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels and state schools superintendent Tony Bennett say Indiana needs a more honest look at the job teachers and principals are doing. How can an internal Department of Education survey find that 99 percent of teachers are rated effective, they ask, when 25 percent of students don't pass statewide exams?

"What we are talking about is integrity," Bennett said. "Our current system is a statistical impossibility."

The issue is among the sweeping education changes Bennett and Daniels will be pushing when the General Assembly meets starting Wednesday. Their agenda also calls for using student performance to measure teacher success, focusing teacher collective bargaining agreements only on salary and wage-related benefits and allowing local districts to reward the best performing teachers instead of rewarding simple seniority.

But before local officials can create ways to reward the best teachers, Daniels and Bennett say they need to have evaluations that really identify the cream of the crop.

Some school districts currently have contracts with teacher unions that prohibit principals from walking into classrooms unannounced for reviews, Bennett said, while other contracts prohibit annual reviews after teachers reach a certain point in their careers.

Indiana State Teachers Association President Nate Schnellenberger said every district handles evaluations differently, and acknowledged that reviews might not be a priority in large school districts where evaluating hundreds of teachers is a matter of logistics. But he said ISTA, which has clashed with Daniels and Bennett on other issues, is on board with yearly reviews.

"That's one place where we can agree with Dr. Bennett in that we support a fair, rigorous evaluation system for educators on a yearly basis," Schnellenberger said.

For teachers worried that personality conflicts with principals could prevent them from getting a fair shake during reviews, Bennett said more accountability and a focus on student performance would help.

"In a highly accountable system, the folks in charge are going to want to keep the best and recruit the best," Bennett said.

Bennett, a Republican first elected in 2008, said he doesn't have a specific goal in mind regarding how many teachers should be classified as effective or highly effective, or how many would fall on the low end of the scale. But he said there could be some teachers who just don't belong in the classroom.

"A huge responsibility we have as professionals is to make sure we do address those who don't improve," Bennett said. "We should very honestly look them in the eye and say education is not the place for you."

Schnellenberger said administrators should work with teachers who aren't performing well and that the long-term goal should be to get all teachers rated as effective.

"Why would we want to have a non-effective teacher in the classroom?" he asked.

While Daniels and Bennett envision using yearly teacher evaluations to help local districts reward the best teachers, Daniels also suggested that they could later be used to determine which colleges do the best job of preparing Indiana teachers.

"I really wish I knew what the worst 10 were so we could say, 'teach something different,'" Daniels said.

For now, though, Daniels and Bennett are hoping that fellow Republicans who control the House and Senate will agree that teacher evaluations need an overhaul.

"We have to focus on teacher and principal quality," Bennett said. "We have to have an evaluation system that truly differentiates good and bad."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No ideas
    How do you evaluate all the intangibles that good teachers do to make their classroom a good learning environment? Not through test scores. In 99% of the cases, it comes down to parent support. I taught 8th grade science in IPS where most of my students read at a 3rd grade level and only about30% passed ISTEP. I now teach in a suburban district where 99% of my students passed ISTEP. I guess I am a wonderful teacher because my ISTEP scores are so good. The governor can keep his incentive pay. I would like him to take mine to hire a teacher to fill the empty classroom next to mine and bring my class size down from 32 to 25 students like it was 5 years ago. In the end, it would be polittically unpopular to hold voting parents responsible for their childrens failure because the parents do not value education or are not educated enough themselves to understand educations importance. Bennett is nothing more than Daniels puppet with no plan of his own. Hopefully he can be removed at the next election and someone that has a vision besides test scores can be put in his place. How about preparing students for a global work force and making technology and foreign language a priority nstead of cutting these curriculums as Daniels and Bennett propose.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT