Green Mountain entrepreneur compiles 17-percent stake in struggling Noble Roman's

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
The 64-year-old founder of Vermont's Green Mountain Coffee Roasters apparently has a taste for Noble Roman's pizza.

Robert P. Stiller, a lifelong entrepreneur who built Green Mountain into a wholesale coffee giant with 7,000 customers and $500 million in revenue, began buying shares in the Indianapolis-based pizza chain in early 2007. He has continued to buy even as the shares have slid dramatically and now owns 3.4 million shares, or 17 percent of the company.

Stiller's stake was worth $1.5 million at the Nov. 9 closing price of 39 cents a share — far less than he paid, though exact figures aren't publicly available.

Stiller, who was named entrepreneur of the year by Forbes magazine in 2001, got his start in business with the creation of EZ-Wider rolling papers in the 1970s. Stiller and a partner sold the company in 1980, taking home $3 million each.

He could not be reached to discuss his investment in Noble Roman's.

Stiller's motivations are a mystery to Noble Roman's President A. Scott Mobley, who is leading an effort to shift the focus of Noble Roman's growth back toward nontraditional locations such as convenience stores, bowling alleys and hospitals.

The moves follow an unsuccessful effort to quickly franchise hundreds of new stand-alone Noble Roman's and Tuscano's Italian Style Subs locations across the country. Many of them failed to attract enough traffic and closed shortly after opening. A group of 10 former franchisees is suing Noble Roman's in Hamilton County, alleging the company misled them in the sales pitch.

"It's a challenging time," Mobley said. "Access to financing is just about impossible. Our nontraditional side is very light on investment; that allows existing business owners to add another business center at a low investment cost."

Noble Roman's has reinvented itself several times over the years since launching in the 1970s as a chain of dine-in restaurants. In 1997, after intense competition and rising costs made stand-alone pizza joints difficult to operate profitably, Noble Roman's turned to franchising nontraditional outlets like gas stations and bowling alleys — a strategy that has paid off handsomely.

Noble Roman's again is pinning its hopes on growth in nontraditional outlets. It has developed a new food-service system for those locations called Noble Roman's Bistro.

The system will feature SuperSlice pizza (one-fourth of a large), along with hot entrees like chicken parmesan and baked penne, the company said in a recent regulatory filing. An optional breakfast menu features scrambled eggs, bacon, biscuits and gravy, and French toast sticks.

In March, the company seized six franchised stores in Carmel, Fishers, Westfield and Noblesville after the locations struggled with what the company calls "management and supervision difficulties." The company now plans to either sell or close the restaurants by Dec. 31, in a bid to save on overhead and operating costs.

Noble Roman's will operate only two locations, including one on Market Street downtown, for training and demonstration purposes. In another money-saving move, the company said in a recent regulatory filing that it has reduced salaries this year.

The chain continues to work with Newport Beach, Calif.-based Roth Capital Partners, a specialist in small-cap companies, to evaluate "various strategies to enhance shareholder value."

The move, revealed in March, raises the possibility that the company could be sold, although observers say tight credit markets and a sputtering economy likely will make a sale difficult, if not impossible.

Mobley, who owns 1.1 million shares of the company, said he and his father, Paul, the company chairman, have never talked to Stiller. Paul Mobley owns 3.3 million shares.

Regulatory filings identify Stiller as a passive investor, not one interested in imposing his will on management.

Stiller's timing was pretty bad to begin building a stake in the company, but the shares no longer look overvalued at less than 40 cents, said Michael Goode, a St. Louis stock trader and financial blogger who writes GoodeValue.com.

Goode previously shorted shares of Noble Roman's, but no longer has a position in the company. He thinks the best move for the chain is to focus on its nontraditional locations; the brand just isn't strong enough as a stand-alone attraction, he said.

"I believe they should stick to what they do well," Goode said. "It's been a very profitable niche for them."

Stiller was revealed as a shareholder in Noble Roman's in February 2007, when he said in a regulatory filing he owned roughly 1 million shares, or about 6 percent of the company. At that time, shares were trading in the $4 range, about 10 times the price they now fetch.

But Stiller has continued to buy. By December 2007, he had amassed 2.2 million shares, regulatory filings show. And by May, he owned 3.4 million shares.

A Connecticut couple, Timothy M. Riley and Angela A. Riley, also has been buying shares in Noble Roman's. The Rileys said in an August filing that they have bought slightly more than 1 million shares, for control of 5.5 percent of the company.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.