IBJNews

Green Mountain entrepreneur compiles 17-percent stake in struggling Noble Roman's

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
The 64-year-old founder of Vermont's Green Mountain Coffee Roasters apparently has a taste for Noble Roman's pizza.

Robert P. Stiller, a lifelong entrepreneur who built Green Mountain into a wholesale coffee giant with 7,000 customers and $500 million in revenue, began buying shares in the Indianapolis-based pizza chain in early 2007. He has continued to buy even as the shares have slid dramatically and now owns 3.4 million shares, or 17 percent of the company.

Stiller's stake was worth $1.5 million at the Nov. 9 closing price of 39 cents a share — far less than he paid, though exact figures aren't publicly available.

Stiller, who was named entrepreneur of the year by Forbes magazine in 2001, got his start in business with the creation of EZ-Wider rolling papers in the 1970s. Stiller and a partner sold the company in 1980, taking home $3 million each.

He could not be reached to discuss his investment in Noble Roman's.

Stiller's motivations are a mystery to Noble Roman's President A. Scott Mobley, who is leading an effort to shift the focus of Noble Roman's growth back toward nontraditional locations such as convenience stores, bowling alleys and hospitals.

The moves follow an unsuccessful effort to quickly franchise hundreds of new stand-alone Noble Roman's and Tuscano's Italian Style Subs locations across the country. Many of them failed to attract enough traffic and closed shortly after opening. A group of 10 former franchisees is suing Noble Roman's in Hamilton County, alleging the company misled them in the sales pitch.

"It's a challenging time," Mobley said. "Access to financing is just about impossible. Our nontraditional side is very light on investment; that allows existing business owners to add another business center at a low investment cost."

Noble Roman's has reinvented itself several times over the years since launching in the 1970s as a chain of dine-in restaurants. In 1997, after intense competition and rising costs made stand-alone pizza joints difficult to operate profitably, Noble Roman's turned to franchising nontraditional outlets like gas stations and bowling alleys — a strategy that has paid off handsomely.

Noble Roman's again is pinning its hopes on growth in nontraditional outlets. It has developed a new food-service system for those locations called Noble Roman's Bistro.

The system will feature SuperSlice pizza (one-fourth of a large), along with hot entrees like chicken parmesan and baked penne, the company said in a recent regulatory filing. An optional breakfast menu features scrambled eggs, bacon, biscuits and gravy, and French toast sticks.

In March, the company seized six franchised stores in Carmel, Fishers, Westfield and Noblesville after the locations struggled with what the company calls "management and supervision difficulties." The company now plans to either sell or close the restaurants by Dec. 31, in a bid to save on overhead and operating costs.

Noble Roman's will operate only two locations, including one on Market Street downtown, for training and demonstration purposes. In another money-saving move, the company said in a recent regulatory filing that it has reduced salaries this year.

The chain continues to work with Newport Beach, Calif.-based Roth Capital Partners, a specialist in small-cap companies, to evaluate "various strategies to enhance shareholder value."

The move, revealed in March, raises the possibility that the company could be sold, although observers say tight credit markets and a sputtering economy likely will make a sale difficult, if not impossible.

Mobley, who owns 1.1 million shares of the company, said he and his father, Paul, the company chairman, have never talked to Stiller. Paul Mobley owns 3.3 million shares.

Regulatory filings identify Stiller as a passive investor, not one interested in imposing his will on management.

Stiller's timing was pretty bad to begin building a stake in the company, but the shares no longer look overvalued at less than 40 cents, said Michael Goode, a St. Louis stock trader and financial blogger who writes GoodeValue.com.

Goode previously shorted shares of Noble Roman's, but no longer has a position in the company. He thinks the best move for the chain is to focus on its nontraditional locations; the brand just isn't strong enough as a stand-alone attraction, he said.

"I believe they should stick to what they do well," Goode said. "It's been a very profitable niche for them."

Stiller was revealed as a shareholder in Noble Roman's in February 2007, when he said in a regulatory filing he owned roughly 1 million shares, or about 6 percent of the company. At that time, shares were trading in the $4 range, about 10 times the price they now fetch.

But Stiller has continued to buy. By December 2007, he had amassed 2.2 million shares, regulatory filings show. And by May, he owned 3.4 million shares.

A Connecticut couple, Timothy M. Riley and Angela A. Riley, also has been buying shares in Noble Roman's. The Rileys said in an August filing that they have bought slightly more than 1 million shares, for control of 5.5 percent of the company.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT