IBJNews

Growing Indiana schools districts suing over funding

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Three school districts are filing a lawsuit over Indiana school-funding formula, arguing that it unfairly penalizes districts with growing enrollments.

The lawsuit is to be filed Tuesday by lawyers for the Hamilton Southeastern district in the northern suburbs of Indianapolis. It will be joined by the Franklin Township district of Indianapolis and the Middlebury Community Schools of Elkhart County.

District officials have long complained about not receiving increases in state funding to match the number of additional students.

Hamilton Southeastern Superintendent Brian Smith said the disparity in per-student funding has become so great that the lawsuit was necessary.

State Attorney General Greg Zoeller said it is a waste of taxpayer money to file a lawsuit over what is a decision for the Legislature.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Stupidity
    They sue because they can and use more governemtn money to do so. Stupidity at it's finest because they want a bailout like to too big to fails. Instead of becoming more efficient and leaner like businesses and private companies, they sue. The truth is that the better off schools can handle the cuts better than inner city schools. The state doesn't owe anyone an education-get over it. People move into high performing school districts becasue they can. Stop whining!
  • May not entirely lunches.
    I did some digging - you are right in that the state does get reimbursed for this program from the fed, however it looks to be capped at $2.62 per child per day - if the cost to feed somebody two meals is $3.00, then each student has an additional burden of $0.38...not much until you multiply that by 26,000 students (per current IPS data that qualify for free lunch) and again by 180 (minimum Indiana school days per year)...$1.7M in the red.

    Additionally, I'm sure there are other services in that number assigned for IPS kids. Keep in mind, of the 33,000ish students in IPS - 1351 are actively homeless which I'm betting requires additional services.

    I understand this is not your problem or doing, but I don't think this is rewarding 'mediocrity', I think its helping those who probably have less help at home.
  • It's not free/reduced lunches
    That's a federal program, and has nothing to do with the state funding formula. It has everything to do with basically penalizing the districts that are growing and are therefore often excellent schools. By continuing to financially reward schools whose enrollments are shrinking, the state is fostering mediocrity by not fully finding the excellent districts that people flock to.
  • Lunches?
    I wonder if the disparity has anything to do with free/reduced lunches. I'm betting Marion and Lake County have a disproportionately high percentage of kids that use the program. Even at $3/student per day (breakfast and lunch), that could easily rack up close to $800 per child per year. If that is the case, I have no qualms with the disparity.
    • Where's Carmel
      I bet they join the lawsuite as well.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

    2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

    3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

    4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

    5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

    ADVERTISEMENT