IBJNews

Baucus health reform bill would stick Indiana companies with fees

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

The health reform bill sponsored by U.S. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., would help pay for expanded health insurance coverage by levying fees of $13 billion a year on the health care industry.

The fees would deliver a hefty bill to just about all of Indiana’s major health care companies. But how they’re reacting to the fees is all over the map.

Here’s a breakdown of what some Indiana companies could pay, derived from each company’s share of the U.S. market. The market totals were calculated by U.S. News & World Report, using data from New York-based research firm Capital IQ:

• WellPoint Inc., $1.1 billion per year

• Eli Lilly and Co., $88 million

• Zimmer Holdings Inc., $88 million

• Biomet Inc., $61 million

The companies crying the loudest are medical-device makers, such as the orthopedics companies in Warsaw.

“We expect that this particular fee would wipe out about 20 percent of all the profitability in the medical-device industry,” Biomet CEO Jeffrey Binder told the “Nightly Business Report” Sept. 16. “And there’s absolutely no way that that will not affect employment.” Because of that potential impact, Indiana’s two senators, Evan Bayh and Richard Lugar, have objected to the fees. Also, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels joined four other governors in writing a letter to Baucus, slamming his proposed fees as a job killer.

“Many of these are high-paying, basic science and engineering jobs that must be preserved and increased for a sector that provides an important economic engine for our country and states,” they wrote.

In the Warsaw area, the orthopedics industry pulls in $11 billion a year and employs 6,000 people. Indiana is also home to other medical companies, such as Bloomington-based Cook Inc., which does not disclose its revenue. Also, the state has been trying to nurture medical-device startups, such as Indianapolis-based Nico Corp.

Even though WellPoint would have a whopping bill, the Indianapolis-based health insurer and its peers haven’t opposed the fees too stridently. That’s because the Baucus bill would also give $452 billion over a decade in subsidies to help Americans buy health insurance.

If WellPoint gets the same share of the new customers as it currently holds—16 percent—it would mean more than $7 billion a year in new revenue. Paying $1 billion to get $7 billion in return is a slam-dunk for any investor.

Lilly isn’t squawking too much, either. Sure, it doesn’t watch $88 million fly out the door lightly, but more people with health insurance also means more people able to buy its prescription drugs.

Besides, Lilly is getting its top legislative goal, which is 12 years of exclusivity before biotech drugs face generic competitors. Legislation in both the House and Senate includes the provision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT