IBJNews

Baucus health reform bill would stick Indiana companies with fees

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

The health reform bill sponsored by U.S. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., would help pay for expanded health insurance coverage by levying fees of $13 billion a year on the health care industry.

The fees would deliver a hefty bill to just about all of Indiana’s major health care companies. But how they’re reacting to the fees is all over the map.

Here’s a breakdown of what some Indiana companies could pay, derived from each company’s share of the U.S. market. The market totals were calculated by U.S. News & World Report, using data from New York-based research firm Capital IQ:

• WellPoint Inc., $1.1 billion per year

• Eli Lilly and Co., $88 million

• Zimmer Holdings Inc., $88 million

• Biomet Inc., $61 million

The companies crying the loudest are medical-device makers, such as the orthopedics companies in Warsaw.

“We expect that this particular fee would wipe out about 20 percent of all the profitability in the medical-device industry,” Biomet CEO Jeffrey Binder told the “Nightly Business Report” Sept. 16. “And there’s absolutely no way that that will not affect employment.” Because of that potential impact, Indiana’s two senators, Evan Bayh and Richard Lugar, have objected to the fees. Also, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels joined four other governors in writing a letter to Baucus, slamming his proposed fees as a job killer.

“Many of these are high-paying, basic science and engineering jobs that must be preserved and increased for a sector that provides an important economic engine for our country and states,” they wrote.

In the Warsaw area, the orthopedics industry pulls in $11 billion a year and employs 6,000 people. Indiana is also home to other medical companies, such as Bloomington-based Cook Inc., which does not disclose its revenue. Also, the state has been trying to nurture medical-device startups, such as Indianapolis-based Nico Corp.

Even though WellPoint would have a whopping bill, the Indianapolis-based health insurer and its peers haven’t opposed the fees too stridently. That’s because the Baucus bill would also give $452 billion over a decade in subsidies to help Americans buy health insurance.

If WellPoint gets the same share of the new customers as it currently holds—16 percent—it would mean more than $7 billion a year in new revenue. Paying $1 billion to get $7 billion in return is a slam-dunk for any investor.

Lilly isn’t squawking too much, either. Sure, it doesn’t watch $88 million fly out the door lightly, but more people with health insurance also means more people able to buy its prescription drugs.

Besides, Lilly is getting its top legislative goal, which is 12 years of exclusivity before biotech drugs face generic competitors. Legislation in both the House and Senate includes the provision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT