Health overhaul's $264M question weighs down WellPoint

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The failure by state regulators to decide how much insurers must spend on patient care is scaring investors from health-plan stocks and complicating company decisions on premiums, commissions and cost cutting.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ decision, expected in June, has slipped to October, and U.S. officials must weigh in after that, said Jane Cline, the association’s president. Whether to include taxes in the calculation, the most pivotal decision remaining, may cost health plans led by Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc. $264 million next year, said Ana Gupte, a Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. analyst in New York.

The health law requires companies to spend at least 80 percent of their premiums on medical care or return the difference to customers. It assigned the commissioners’ group to decide how to calculate that figure, known as the medical-loss ratio. Their delay has helped drive insurer stocks down for six months, Gupte said in a telephone interview.

The formula and “the federal tax issue have become a proxy for the broader political risk facing the industry,” she said. “There are many people that will not invest at all until they know for sure what the definitions look like.”

Shares of insurers, led by Indianapolis-based WellPoint, have dropped 3.8 percent since the health overhaul was approved March 22 by Congress, as measured by the Standard & Poor’s 500 Managed Health Care Index. The broader S&P 500 has lost 2.2 percent in that time.

Shares in WellPoint, the biggest insurer by enrollment, have declined 13 percent in value since March 22. Coventry Health Systems Inc., a Bethesda, Md.-based insurer, has lost 18 percent. The two companies face the biggest potential rebates as a percentage of earnings among for-profit plans next year because of their reliance on policies for individuals and small employers, where administrative costs and profit margins tend to be higher, Gupte said.

Kristin Binns, a WellPoint spokeswoman, and Drew Asher, Coventry’s senior vice president for corporate finance, didn’t return messages seeking comment.

For insurers, the most important issue yet to be decided is how to treat federal payroll and income taxes paid by the companies, Gupte said. If taxes are subtracted from premiums, as insurers want, the six biggest for-profit plans would rebate $859 million next year, she estimated in an Aug. 31 note to clients. Including taxes, as some lawmakers demanded in August, would raise the potential giveback to $1.12 billion.

The uncertainty has left insurers to set rates, negotiate broker commissions and craft budgets without knowing their ultimate costs, Gupte said. Most publicly traded plans have chosen simply to price according to their expected medical costs and desired profit, even if it means risking a bigger rebate in 2011, she said.

A subcommittee of the Kansas City-based commissioners’ group initially sided with industry on the tax question. The controversy prompted the association to withdraw the ruling and leave the decision to its 17-member executive committee. The panel hopes to issue final recommendations for the medical-loss ratio at its national meeting in Orlando, starting Oct. 18, said Cline, West Virginia’s insurance commissioner.

The deliberations have been necessary to sort through questions over what spending may be considered medical care and how quickly the regulation can be imposed without driving insurers out of the market, Cline said in a Sept. 17 interview.

“I have had more input from consumer groups, interest groups and the industry on the subject of medical-loss ratios than I have on any other subject in my 10-year tenure,” Cline said. “Ultimately, we’ll have to make the best determination that fits with the spirit of the law.”

Even after the group makes its decision, the law gives the final say to President Barack Obama’s Health and Human Services Department. Cline declined to predict how closely the agency would follow her group’s advice. She also declined to give her position on the tax issue.

Cline and commissioners from Florida, Kansas and Iowa are scheduled to visit Obama this week in Washington to discuss the health overhaul, the association said.

The legislation says the medical ratio should be calculated “excluding federal and state taxes.” In an Aug. 10 letter, the Democratic chairman of six congressional committees said they meant the law to omit only the insurance taxes created under the bill, not payroll or income levies.

America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry trade group, responded with its legal interpretation, citing the law’s “plain, unambiguous language” for subtracting “the broad array of taxes and fees.”

If insurers lose the argument, they may sue, blocking a key provision of Democrats’ overhaul, said Peter Harbage, a Sacramento, Calif.-based health-policy consultant to unions, foundations and county governments.

“There’s a pretty good chance that any part of this could end up in court,” Harbage, a former adviser to John Edwards, who was a Democratic presidential candidate and senator from North Carolina. “There’s so much money at stake. I think the insurance industry is likely to use every approach possible to try to make sure they’re getting the best deal possible.”

The rule will impose the biggest costs on insurers focused on selling to individuals or small employers and those with higher administrative expenses or profit margins, Gupte said.

WellPoint would pay rebates as high as $341 billion next year if it can’t exclude taxes and trim its projected earnings by 8.5 percent a share, she said. Coventry may rebate as much as $52 million, cutting earnings 10.9 percent, she said.

Overall, Gupte said the regulation is likely to shave earnings by 5 percent to 6.4 percent a share next year for the top six plans: WellPoint; Coventry; UnitedHealth Group Inc. of Minnetonka, Minnesota; Aetna Inc. of Hartford, Connecticut; Humana Inc. of Louisville, Kentucky and Cigna Corp. of Philadelphia.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Great article and post scripts by Mike L (Great addition to IBJ BTW). Bobby's stubborn as a mule, and doubt if he ever comes back to IU. But the love he would receive would be enormous. Hope he shows some time, but not counting on it.

  2. When the Indiana GOP was going around the State selling the Voucher bill they were promising people that the vouchers would only be for public charter schools. They lied. As usual.

  3. I am Mr. Morris Ray, a Legitimate And a Reputable money Lender. We lend funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, we give loan to people that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills, to invest on business. Have you been looking for loan? you have not to worry, because you are in the right place i offer loan at low interest rate of 2% so if you are in need of a loan i want you to just contact me via this email Address: morris_ray123@outlook.com

  4. Jim, your "misleading" numbers comment is spot on. This is the spin these posers are putting on it. News flash, fans: these guys lie. They are not publicly traded so no one holds them accountable for anything they say. The TV numbers are so miniscule to begin with any "increase" produces double digit "growth" numbers. It's ridiculous to think that anything these guys have done has awakened the marketplace. What have they done? Consolidate the season so they run more races on consecutive weekends? And this creates "momentum." Is that the same momentum you enjoy when you don't race between August and March? Keep in mind that you are running teams who barely make ends meet ragged over the summer to accomplish this brilliant strategy of avoiding the NFL while you run your season finale at midnight on the East Coast. But I should not obfuscate my own point: any "ratings increase" is exactly what Jim points to - the increased availability of NBC Sports in households. Look fans, I love the sport to but these posers are running it off a cliff. Miles wants to declare victory and then run for Mayor. I could go on and on but bottom line for God's sake don't believe a word they say. Note to Anthony - try doing just a little research instead of reporting what these pretenders say and then offering an "opinion" no more informed than the average fan.

  5. If he's finally planning to do the right thing and resign, why not do it before the election? Waiting until after means what - s special election at tax payer expense? Appointment (by whom?) thus robbing the voters of their chance to choose? Does he accrue some additional financial advantage to waiting, like extra pension payments? What's in it for him? That's the question that needs to be asked.