High gas prices leading to lower demand for ethanol

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Waning demand for gasoline is putting the United States on course to miss a target for ethanol use for the first time, signaling no let-up in the slide in prices.

A 2007 U.S. law requires refiners to mix 13.2 billion gallons of renewable products with motor fuels in 2012, up 4.8 percent from last year. Gasoline demand averaged over four weeks fell 3.8 percent from a year earlier, the U.S. Energy Department reported Wednesday. On an annualized basis, fuel consumption was 131.4 billion gallons.

Ethanol’s discount to gasoline widened to a record $1.25 a gallon on March 29, more than three times the 12-month average, as the surplus supply of the biofuel grew. Demand is falling as gasoline, or the reformulated blendstock known as RBOB, soared 24 percent this year, becoming the best performer of the 24 commodities in the Standard & Poor’s GSCI index. Ethanol is blended into gasoline at a mix of 10 percent.

“We may not make the 13.2 billion,” said Wallace Tyner, an agricultural economist at Purdue University. “Right now it’s not even profitable to make ethanol.”

Ethanol rose 0.9 cent, or 0.4 percent, to settle at $2.284 a gallon on the Chicago Board of Trade. Prices are down 16 percent from a year ago as the market struggles with a glut. Gasoline has risen 4.3 percent on the New York Mercantile Exchange over the past 12 months and settled at $3.3405 a gallon.

Distillers are losing 11 cents a gallon, based on current prices for corn and the biofuel, assuming a bushel of corn generates 2.75 gallons of ethanol, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Producers were making about 4.3 cents a gallon on the fuel at this time last year.

Ethanol, fermented from corn in the U.S., has received government support since the Energy Tax Act of 1978. President George W. Bush made it part of his plan to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil in 2006 and more than doubled the country’s renewable fuels targets in the 2007 law that calls for the U.S. to use 15 billion gallons of the fuel by 2015.

U.S. production more than doubled to 13.9 billion gallons in 2011 from 6.5 billion in 2007, according to the Renewable Fuels Association, a Washington-based trade group.

Congress, last year, allowed a 45-cent-a-gallon tax credit that helped support demand to lapse. The incentive had been in place since Jimmy Carter was president and ethanol proponents assumed that the blending target, known as the renewable fuels standard, would be enough to maintain sales growth.

“If you want to hindsight them and say it was a bad call you could,” Jason Ward, an analyst at Northstar Commodity Investments in Minneapolis, said. “The more appropriate call is that nobody saw this happening with demand. This is not normal.”

Demand is slowing as the U.S. economy is expected to grow at an average of 2.2 percent this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That would be down from a 3-percent annual rate in the last three months of 2011.

Ethanol proponents may have won a partial reprieve in January 2011, when the Environmental Protection Agency granted a request from producers to raise the allowable amount of the biofuel in gasoline for vehicles made after 2001 to 15 percent from 10 percent, a formula referred to as E-15. The increase may spur increased ethanol use even as gasoline demand falls.

The EPA on April 2 said it approved applications from Archer Daniels Midland Co., Cargill Inc. and 18 other companies to market ethanol in the higher blend with gasoline. President Barack Obama has set a goal of helping filling station owners install 10,000 blending pumps for E-15 over the next five years.

Iowa Governor Terry Branstad said in a March telephone interview that his state, the largest ethanol producer in the U.S., is working to be the first to use the higher blends and serve as a template for other states to follow.

While the higher concentrated formula would help the U.S. reach the biofuels targets and soak up the glut, retailers may be hesitant to sell it because of the potential liability for damaged engines and warranties, Tyner said.

Producers are making more ethanol than they can sell. Ethanol stockpiles have risen 13 out of the past 16 weeks going back to Dec. 16 and reached a record 22.7 million barrels in the week ended March 16, according to Energy Department data.

“You’ve got ethanol spilling out of storage, that’s your problem,” Ward said.

The EPA may have to reduce the requirements for how much refiners are supposed to use this year, said Michael Cox, an analyst at Piper Jaffray & Co. in New York.

The administration had to cut the targets for so-called advanced biofuel in 2011 and this year because the fuel, made from switchgrass, woodchips or agricultural waste, isn’t yet commercially available.

Retail gasoline demand through March 30 was 5.6 percent below the same period in 2011 because of higher prices, according to MasterCard Inc.’s SpendingPulse report on April 3. Fuel use over the previous four weeks was 5.9 percent lower than a year earlier, a record 54th consecutive decline.

“On the one hand, you have an economy that is recovering, albeit at a very sluggish rate, and on the other hand, we’re headed toward price levels we haven’t seen since 2008,” John Gamel, a gasoline analyst and director of economic analysis for SpendingPulse, said by phone.

That will make it difficult for the U.S. to use the 13.2 billion gallons of ethanol this year and even more challenging for it to consume the 13.8 billion in 2013, said Ian Horowitz, an analyst at Topeka Capital Markets Inc. in New York.

“Something has to budge,” Horowitz said. “We’re in the world of oversupply again.”


    Mr. Wilson has so many things wrong in his comment that I had to respond.

    1 - Ethanol has never cost $7 to produce or anything close to it. There is no longer even a 45 cent blenders credit, as Congress eliminated it last year. Right now pricing is strictly by the market.
    2 - The price of food is MUCH more effected by the price of fuel than it is by the price of farm products like corn. A $4 box of corn flakes contains about 10 cents worth of corn.
    Having ethanol in the market increases overall fuel supply and, according to a recent University of Wisconsin study, reduces fuel prices at the pump by around 90 cents/gallon. Add to that that every gallon of E10 (when ethanol is over a dollar cheaper than gas)saves consumers another 10 cents/ gallon.
    And there is NO evidence that E10 causes ANY drop in fuel mileage. NONE. Ethanol's smaller btu figure is more than made up for by its much higher octane levels.
    3 - Farmers do NOT get subsidies from the government when their crops are selling for a profit. Which they are.
    4 - The amount of corn used for ethanol production is exactly the same amount of increased yields per acre that America's corn growers have seen in the last 20 years. Same acreage, 37% more corn. And LESS fertilizer, less pesticides, less water used, less run off.
    There has NOT been any switch in acres away from soybeans and wheat.
    And 33% of every bushel of corn used to make ethanol also produces a high protein animal feed that is in great demand by livestock producers around the globe.

    Mr. Wilson obviously has not a clue about modern agriculture or the basics of ethanol production.

    If ethanol production ended tomorrow - gas prices would skyrocket, food prices would spike, farmers would see huge losses, and the only winners would be big multinational oil companies and countries like Iran and Venezuela.
  • Less Corn Ethanol is Good
    Less corn ethanol is good for the average person, so why are we complaining? Corn ethanol gets two-thirds the mileage of gas and costs about 7-8 dollars to produce if you count the all-in costs of subsidies to rich farmers and big agribusiness. The average person gets hurt by corn ethanol via higher food prices and big-time water pollution due to increased use of pesticides and fertilizer associated with corn on corn rotations. Why do you think food prices are skyrocketing? Corn ethanol is the reason my friends, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that when you burn up 40 percent of the nations corn crop and displace the associated bean and wheat acreage that food prices go up, up, up. But I guess the good news is that it helps politicians buy votes in farm states and keep the rich farmers, Purdue ag welfare crowd happy.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

    2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

    3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

    4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

    5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............