IBJNews

VIDEO: Fair Finance investor's family lost $475K

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Donald Russell, a retired deputy sheriff from Wayne County, Ohio, took the stand in the fraud trial of Tim Durham and two co-defendants on Tuesday. He was the first of a handful of Ohio investors who together lost more than $200 million in Fair Finance who are expected to testify as government witnesses during the trial in U.S. District Court.



Russell started investing in 1991, and by the time the FBI raided Fair in 2009, he had deposited his life savings of $350,000. Even more painful: He had encouraged his mother, Willie Pearl Russell, to invest her life savings of $125,000. Russell said he let his guard down; he didn’t read the investment offering circulars and didn’t realize Durham and Cochran had bought the company in 2002 and changed its business model.

He got nervous in January 2009, when an interest check did not land in his account as expected. He asked a bunch of questions and eventually got a call back from co-defendant Jim Cochran, who reassured him everything was OK. The FBI raided and shut down Fair that November. His 82-year-old mother landed in the hospital the next day and died a month later. He believes stress from the financial loss contributed to her death.

After testifying on Tuesday, he shared his story with IBJ (see video above).

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Sherifing Nestegg
    Deputy sherifing must be real good there in Ohio to be able to invest that much cash.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT