IBJNews

Holiday Inn to hit auction block with $1M opening bid

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A Holiday Inn hotel along Interstate 69 just north of 96th Street in Fishers is scheduled to hit the auction block next month with a suggested opening bid of $1 million.

The 78-room hotel at 9780 North by Northeast Boulevard, built in 1994 and renovated in 2004, is owned by Fishers-based Dora Brothers Hospitality Corp.

Dora decided to sell the property after it could not secure financing from lender Regions Bank to add a restaurant to replace a vacant former Bennigan's, said Tim Dora, a company principal. Holiday Inn hotels must offer food service.

The hotel sits next door to a Holiday Inn Express and across the street from a Hotel Indigo and Hilton Garden Inn, all of which also are owned by Dora. The restaurant site, which has a separate owner, is not part of the auction.

The franchise agreement with Holiday Inn is set to expire Sept. 31, giving a new owner an opportunity to rebrand and reposition the property as a limited service hotel, Douglas Johnson of CB Richard Ellis Auction Services, which is handling the sale, said in a statement.

In sales materials, CB Richard Ellis describes the sale as "bank forced." Regions didn't want any more hotel loans, and the property's value exceeds what Dora owes on its loan, Dora said.

"The partnership just came to the conclusion it's just easier to sell it, pay the lender and move on," he said.

The auction is scheduled for 1 p.m. Aug. 31 at the adjacent Fishers Hospitality & Conference Center. Registration begins at noon, and a depoisit of $50,000 is required to bid.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT