Hoosier Park owner Centaur files for bankruptcy protection

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Centaur LLC, owner of Hoosier Park horse track and casino in Anderson, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization, the company announced Sunday.

The company's casino, racing and hotel operations will continue without interruption during the reorganization, it said.

Centaur has been struggling under a heavy debt load for some time. In October 2009,  the company missed a $13.4 million payment due on more than $400 million in outstanding debt, putting the company in default with its lenders.

In its court filing, Centaur was not specific about the extent of its debt problems. It estimated liabilities of $500 million to $1 billion and assets of $500 million to $1 billion.

Philadelphia-based PREIT Services Inc. is listed as Centaur’s biggest unsecured creditor, with a claim of $28.7 million. PREIT Services is an affiliate of Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust, which has done extensive contract and development work for Centaur in Pennsylvania.

In 2007, Centaur agreed to pay PREIT $87 million for terminating a development and construction management contract for a racetrack and casino in Beaver County, Pa.

Centaur’s second largest unsecured creditor is listed as Louisville-based Churchill Downs Inc., with a claim of $15 million. Churchill Downs was one of the original owners of Hoosier Park, which was completed in 1994, but it sold its remaining interest in the facility to Centaur in 2007.

After winning the General Assembly’s approval in 2007 to install slot machines at Hoosier Park, Centaur borrowed heavily to pay Indiana’s $250 million license fee and spent another $150 million on mandatory Hoosier Park upgrades.

Centaur has complained that Indiana’s ongoing gambling taxes, not the $250 million license fee, have hurt its ability to reduce debt. Hoosier Park and its Shelbyville counterpart, Indiana Live!, must fork over more than 47 percent of their gambling revenue in taxes, compared with the 35-percent rate riverboats pay. Most of the difference goes to subsidize Indiana’s horse racing industry.

In October, Centaur filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in Pennsylvania for two subsidiaries that hope to develop a racino there. Centaur has long pursued development of the project, called Valley View Downs and Casino, 55 miles northwest of Pittsburgh, but the project stalled when regulatory approvals and financing there fell through in 2008.

Centaur also has operations in Colorado, where it owns Fortune Valley Hotel & Casino in Central City, west of Denver.

In a press release, Centaur said it planned to emerge from bankruptcy "in a strong financial position with less debt and an improved capital structure." It said "plans continue to move forward for the launch of Valley View Downs in western Pennsylvania."

“For our customers and employees, we look forward to a seamless experience during the reorganization process,” said Jim Brown, Hoosier Park's general manager of gaming, in a written statement. "Positive cash flow generated from daily operations and cash reserves are more than adequate to fund operating expenses, including supplier obligations and employee wages, salaries and benefits during the restructuring period."


  • Video Poker & slots
    Does this filing for bankruptcy mean the games, such as video poker and slot machines, will be looser to get more customers in or tighter to pay off the debt?
  • Track Makes no Logistical Sense
    This track is in a difficult location. It's quite far from Indy, and it's in a town that is desperately unappealing to anyone from Indy.

    Hoosier Park and Indy would both be served if this track closed and rebuilt inside 465.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.