IBJNews

Hospitals map out ways to bypass insurers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Clarian Health is launching its own health insurance plan, the boldest of several initiatives at Indianapolis hospitals to bypass health insurers and provide health benefits directly to employers.

Officials at Indianapolis’ major private hospital systems say their efforts would change how they are paid in a way that would encourage preventive and parsimonious care. Most health insurance models today encourage hospitals to do as many procedures as they can, the officials say.

But hospitals also see themselves in a position now to challenge the powerful sales proposition of Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield that has led it to such a dominating position in the Indianapolis and Indiana markets.

That’s because hospitals can give discounts equal to those they give to Anthem and, they think, process claims through a third-party administration firm for less than what Anthem charges. That would allow them to offer employers health benefits at a lower cost.

Also, the hospitals have built up much larger networks of providers through a string of physician acquisition and affiliation deals. Those networks aren’t nearly as large as Anthem’s, but many observers think they might be large enough to get interest from employers, who are desperate to find some solution that lessens the huge health care cost spikes of the past decade.

“For 20 years, this concept’s been talked about, but we’re finally at the point where the finances are lining up,” said Greg Pemberton, a health care attorney at Ice Miller LLP in Indianapolis.

alex slabosky Slabosky

Clarian’s new health plan is led by Alex Slabosky, the former CEO of M-Plan Inc., a health maintenance organization in which Clarian held an 86-percent stake. M-Plan folded in 2008, but since then Slabosky has been working for Clarian operating a Medicare Advantage plan for the federal government.

Slabosky declined through a spokeswoman to comment for this story, saying details of Clarian’s new initiative have yet to be approved by Clarian’s board.

But Clarian officials have been talking to benefits brokers about its plan, pitching it as a new health plan for self-funded employers, which pay health claims out of their own coffers instead of paying premiums to a health insurer.

A third-party administrator will process claims for employers.

Among the details not known is what Clarian will call the plan. The hospital system will change its name to Indiana University Health in the first quarter next year.

Through a series of acquisitions over the past three years, Clarian now operates 16 hospitals throughout the state. Through a joint venture with the Indiana University School of Medicine, Clarian is trying to employ 1,200 to 1,500 physicians through an entity called the Indiana Clinic.

Community, which now has more than 1,000 physicians employed or closely affiliated with its hospitals, is considering starting its own health plan, too, said Tom Fischer, chief financial officer.

fact boxCommunity’s goal is to move toward a payment system that rewards it for managing the health of patients well before they need hospital care and, it hopes, reduce their need for expensive procedures.

The hospital system hopes to accomplish those goals by having a single electronic record for each patient that can be accessed by every doctor in its system and by rewarding doctors for communicating with their colleagues and with patients.

“We have to get away from episodic care and focus much, much more on preventive health care,” Fischer said. “We will work with anybody, whether they be other providers or employers or insurance companies.”

Not a threat

Anthem officials aren’t too worried by the hospital’s initiatives at this point. The company insures more than 42 percent of all people covered by employer-sponsored health insurance in the Indianapolis area, according to data from Tennessee-based market researcher HealthLeaders-InterStudy.

Anthem’s parent company, Indianapolis-based WellPoint Inc., claims another 13 percent of the employer-sponsored market through out-of-state subsidiaries that insure customers in central Indiana.

The next-largest health insurer in this market is Minnesota-based UnitedHealthcare, which claims 12 percent of the employer-sponsored customers.

Because Anthem has such large volumes of customers, all hospitals and most doctors opt to be part of its provider network, which requires them to offer services at a discount. Anthem is able to command the largest discounts because of its market share.

Employers are drawn to Anthem because its huge network gives its employees the widest choice of providers—a benefit they see as key to attracting and retaining top-notch workers.

“Our customers tell us having that kind of choice is important,” said Tony Felts, spokesman for Anthem’s Indiana plan.

Indeed, limited geographic footprints is one of the biggest challenges hospitals will face in trying to start health plans.

Clarian, which will limit its new health plan to providers in its Clarian Quality Partners program, has medical office buildings on all sides of the city, but its hospitals are in the west, north and downtown areas of Indianapolis.

St. Vincent is concentrated on the city’s north and west sides. St. Francis dominates the south side. Community Health Network covers the northeast, east and south sides.

“If you said, ‘Everybody’s got to go to St. Vincent’s,’ my guess is somebody on the south side would be put off by that,” said Ed Abel, a hospital accountant at Indianapolis-based Blue & Co.

Other options

If both Clarian and Community start their own health plans, they will compete with Advantage Health Solutions, the Indianapolis-based health plan partly owned by the two other major hospitals operating in Indianapolis: St. Vincent Health and St. Francis Hospital & Health Centers.

Fischer Fischer

Advantage covers more than 80,000 Hoosiers, some directly and some by renting its network to other organizations. Such provider-run health plans are more common in other parts of the state, such as Evansville and Fort Wayne, but have been rare in Indianapolis in recent years.

Separately from Advantage, St. Francis started allowing self-funded employers to “rent” access to its network of physicians and facilities in 2006. To date, it has signed up the city of Beech Grove and four other employers.

St. Francis has partnered for even longer with the Envision network run by Major Hospital in Shelbyville and Johnson Memorial Hospital in Franklin. That network is rented by 14 employers, such as Ryobi Die Casting and Shelby Materials.

Major and Johnson refer cases that are too complex for their facilities to St. Francis. Also, when cases are too complex for St. Francis, such as a rare pediatric surgery, it refers patients to Riley Hospital for Children, which is owned by Clarian.

Employers that rent the Envision and St. Francis networks place participating providers in a first tier that includes the lowest expenses for employees, and place Riley or other outside facilities in a second tier, with somewhat higher payments for employees.

Envision started in the early 1990s and, unlike similar efforts by many Indianapolis hospitals, never died off.

“It gives the employer an alternative on Anthem,” said Ryan Claxton, Major’s director of business development. “If the employer has a bad experience, or receives a double-digit, 30-percent increase, they do have another option.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • An Observation
    Preventitive care should always be encouraged by our health care providers, but insurance carriers should not be required to pay for all preventive care. I believe that cancer screenings are important and should be covered, but that each individual should be repsonsible for his or her actions pertaining to positive healthy habits. I believe the physicians would not order so many procedures that have to be paid by insurance if there weren't so many lawsuits. If the physicians were comfortable ordering only the diagnostics relative to the illness rather than everything under the sun, then health care costs would be lower. I DO NOT WANT a single payer system just because everybody else in the world has one. As far as I have heard there are governments (Greece, Spain, Germany for example) going broke because they can't afford to pay for their constituents health care costs, not to mention the waiting lists. The United States has the best health care in the world! Ask the Canadians! I work at Community and I hope they follow Clarian's example.
  • Yes!
    ...and I agree with Carla as well, so many of the family practice docs I know complain they don't get paid to help folks be healthier- which would save big $$$- but instead only get paid to do procedures (that's why many of them resent specialists!)
  • Berwick surprise?!
    hey that's one of the more insightful comments I've seen from you sir...yeah, being in health care for over 15 years I can tell you that neither the hospitals or insurance companies are doing/ want to do anything about reducing costs, not do they want you to know about all their 'hiddne' agreements re: payments to providers...the only TRUE way to provide affordable, efficient health care is to NOT just pay for expensive procedures but to pay for preventative care, plus go to single-payer system - WHICH EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD HAS - which will save at least 25-40% in health care costs! We spend a higher % of GDP on health care than any other country yet rank #36 in health care quality!

    http://www.who.int/whr/2000/media_centre/press_release/en/index.html
  • Time Will Tell
    As a customer, I would never trust a provider to basically pay themselves. Why not just start offering similar or lower discounts to individuals directly for certain types of service to get the ball rolling on a direct pay system?

    One auto accident will show you how quickly these providers disregard network discounts in order to get every dime they can from your auto insurance carrier. I've seen people lose a LOT of money because these named companies will avoid required insurance discounts to get paid in full on a $75,000.00 bill when they'd usually accept half of that. As weird as it feels to say it, the insurance company serves some purpose in being a seperate entity with its own financial interest. If you had to address these issues on your own, because the TPA has no obligation beyond processing the claims, you would hear one things from Clarian, St. Francis, etc.: COLLECTIONS.
  • Carla
    You are so right about that, Carla! There are not many entities around like Mayo Clinic striving to get to the root of the problem. Every hospital you see now has a "cancer treatment center", for example. Makes you wonder, do they get paid to cure?? or to treat?

    The answer is we all have to dig a little deeper and find out what we can take control of outside modern medicine. We all know our own bodies better than anyone else. If we took steps to take care of ourselves through what we eat, how we exercise, and how we treat our medical issues, we could have better health and avoid some of the dealing with the medical industry and the outrageous costs they have amassed.
  • About time
    Congratulation to Clarion. It's about time health care provider take back control of supply and pricing - like any other provider of goods and services.

    Community? Get with it. Your facility is in my neighborhood along with your physician network. Why should I travel across town for health care?

    Any of these locals plans will also need to provide "out of network" coverage for members.
  • Alternative Healthcare
    If the medical community would open itself up to embrace alternative health care and consider supplements and herbs as an alternative to prescription drugs we could lower health care costs. Also, there needs to be a shift to treating the whole person instead of just treating symptoms.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT