IBJNews

Hostess plant closings so far spare Indy, Columbus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Hostess Brands Inc., the maker of Wonder bread and Twinkies, said Monday that it is permanently shutting plants in Cincinnati, Seattle and St. Louis because it couldn’t get enough members of its striking bakery workers’ union to cross the picket lines to keep them open.

The company has threatened additional closings but so far hasn’t said that it will shut down its plants in Indianapolis and Columbus, which have joined a nationwide strike against proposed labor contracts that would cut wages 8 percent in the first year of a five-year agreement.

Hostess employs about 875 workers in Indiana, 436 of them members in the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union, Hostess spokesman Erik Halvorson said. The firm employs 288 workers in its Indianapolis bakery, 212 of them members of that union.

In a statement, Hostess CEO Gregory Rayburn said: “We will close the entire company if widespread strikes cripple our business,”

The strike affects 23 of Hostess’ 36 plants, the company said. Half the affected plants are operating, the company said.

The company can’t continue operating with so many affected plants, Rayburn said. Hostess is “days away” from having to shut down entirely, he said.

The bakery workers’ union went on strike at some locations, including Indianapolis and Columbus, in reaction to what the union called the “unilateral imposition of a horrendous contract” rejected by 92 percent of the membership.

Drivers represented by the Teamsters Union have ratified a new contract with 8 percent in wage concessions and 17 percent in benefit reductions. The Teamsters are honoring the bakery workers’ picket lines at some locations.

Texas-based Hostess said enough union members are crossing the picket lines to allow “full operations” at about half the struck plants.

“Some employees are apparently under the misimpression that if they force Hostess to liquidate, another company will buy our bakeries and offer them employment,"  Rayburn said in his statement.

The industry has “far too much capacity,” Rayburn said. “I believe the leadership of the bakers union knows this fact, but is willing to sacrifice its Hostess employees for the sake of preventing other bakery companies from asking for similar concessions.”

Hostess is making “false claims” in a “desperate attempt to break our members’ solidarity and scare our members into giving up their fight for their pensions, their health insurance, their wages and their families,” bakery union Secretary-Treasurer Dave Durkee said Monday in a statement.

The bakery workers’ union said it represents 5,000 Hostess workers.

Hostess previously said the bakery workers voted against the contract because they were erroneously told there was a white knight ready to buy the company and avoid wage cuts.

“There is no buyer waiting to purchase the entire company and there never has been,” a Hostess spokesman, Lance Ignon, said in an e-mailed statement.

Teamsters officials couldn’t be reached for comment on the strike.
Hostess filed a bankruptcy reorganization plan last month that can’t be implemented without selling some assets or obtaining new financing. Both the Teamsters and the bakery workers’ union made voluntary concessions in the first Chapter 11 reorganization, which began in 2004.

Hostess filed under Chapter 11 for a second time in January, listing assets of $982 million against liabilities totaling $1.43 billion.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Unions Add Zero Value
    Just another example of how unions drive up costs and eventually lead businesses to no longer be competitive. This is proof, by far the best and most recognizable brand in the industry, and can no longer compete because the union was too stubborn to change. Its not 1925 anymore and competitors will eat you alive if you don't constantly improve. The UAW made concessions - they knew the same thing would have happened to domestic automakers had they not adjusted their beliefs of constant entitlements.
  • Sherman
    You must be a Republician. Always on the side of the company.Were you aware that the company bosses gave them self a big pay bonus and forced their employees to take a pay cut.How would you like to work for them?
    • umbuddah
      Why is it always the unions fault and never a mention of what management is willing to concede?
    • Hostess/Little Debbie
      I stopped buying Hostess because they cost twice as much as Little Debbie, until now I never knew why Hostess cost so much. The economy is in the dumper and unions and government still want more. Unlike the government, the union can't force me to pay more. I wonder why unions don't take over the companies they are determined to run into the ground. Much easier to sit back and collect the monthly dues then send the check to the DNC every two years. I must admit, the unions get a better return on their investment with the DNC then Hostess has gotten from the union. The membership shouldn't worry. Once their jobs are gone they still have the hammock of unemployment insurance and Obama Care, don't forget the food stamps and free Obama phone. How much of that 8% could be recouped by not paying union dues. Cross the line, go back to work. Save your jobs and your self respect.
      • Twinkies are saved!
        Yay! Viva la' Ding Dongs!
      • Stealing the Middle Class
        What is going on is a continuation of the stealing of the middle class in the name of economic competition--an 8% wage cut is just? Hedrick Smith, former New Times editor explains it in his book, "Who Stole the American Dream", for example, since 1978 American productivity has increased 80% but wages only 10%. Corporations took the 70% and are not sharing it--that didnt used to happen. Before '78 wages increased at the same rate. And to make it worse, this is ony happening in America. Not the rest of the world---and our middle class is dying, along with our country. Something has to change or we are finished as a nation.
        • Qu'ils mangent de la brioche
          Get it?

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
         
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

        2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

        3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

        4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

        5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

        ADVERTISEMENT