IBJNews

House advances central Indiana transit measure

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House has signed off on a measure that public transportation advocates hope could lead to expanded bus service in central Indiana and potentially pay for a new rail line from Noblesville to downtown Indianapolis.

Supporters of the mass-transit bill said Monday that the measure is needed to connect workers to available jobs and improve the Indianapolis metro region's image among young professionals. Opponents say it would add another tax and create potentially wasteful projects.

The measure would allow Marion County and its surrounding "doughnut" counties to ask voters to approve a new income tax through a referendum to pay for the new transit services. The House voted 56-39 Monday to night to approve the transportation measure.

Public transportation advocates are pushing a $1.3 billion expansion of the local transit system that would initially raise income taxes in Marion and Hamilton County by 0.3 percent.

An amended version of the bill would let rural townships opt out of both voting on whether to authorize the taxes or paying the taxes.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Demopublicans!
    Huh. I thought the Republicans were in charge. They're sure acting like Democrats.
  • Correct Info
    Spider and Steve, The system is currently set up to be used as a no choice ridership system. This is due to a lack of funding and priority. Recent changes include an additional crosstown route along 86th street and the new plan would feature crosstown rapid transit lines n/s and e/w. Steve, Not all of the counties will be included in this plan. The current legislation is for Marion and Hamilton only. Marion can approve the plan and construct w/o any other county approval or funding. outside counties need Marion to approve their plan to approve a plan of their own. The taxing would only occur within the county where the plan provides service and where the citizens voted for it. It is essentially a pay to play process. The current bill features an amendment that would let rural townships opt out.
  • Just Say "NO"
    So there's a plan to expand IndyGo, which has never been able to figure out how to operate at a profit and can't even figure out how to properly serve just Indianapolis in a timely manner, into Hamilton County and elsewhere, and (using the bulk of the 1.3 billion) begin rail service between downtown and Noblesville, and ALL the 'donut' counties are to be taxed? To pay for what will obviously benefit Hamilton County the most (if there is any real 'benefit' at all)?? I would think every county except Hamilton would reject this very easily. Heck, I'm in Hamilton County and I reject it! If "public transportation advocates", "young professionals" and downtown businesses want to expand mass transit let them raise the money to do it themselves and leave my taxes alone. I'll be voting "NO" on this failure waiting to happen.
  • Spider web plan
    Wake up people! IndyGo still has not comprehended that everybody in the Indy Metro area does not work/commute to downtown. Review of their Master Plan confirms they are still going down the road of the old spider web approach to public transit. I am yet to see any attempt to interconnect all the surrounding suburbs without having to go downtown to change buses to get to another part of town. Case-in-point: 11.4 mile/20 minute commute from the near Southside to the near Westside per IndyGo’s current online route planner goes like this: 0.9 mile walk followed by a serpentine bus route to downtown followed by a 2 block walk followed by a semi direct bus route to the Westside for a total route time of 1 hour 54 minutes. Remember, it’s only an 11.4 mile/20 minute drive to do the same commute. Reviewing IndyGo’s master plan yet again, does this change at all? NO! So why would anybody in their right mind vote to impose yet more income taxes to better serve a vast minority of commuters who work downtown?
  • Better Details on the Plan
    This is great news for Indy Connect and Indianapolis in general, check out this video synopsis of the transit plan, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcDAgWWawd8

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT