IBJNews

House committee mulls corporate contribution to mass transit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Whether to make businesses ante up for the creation of a mass-transit system they have pushed for will be a key consideration in House Republicans’ vote on the issue Monday at the Indiana Statehouse.

The House Ways and Means Committee on Monday morning took up Senate Bill 176, which authorizes central Indiana counties to pass tax increases for a regional mass-transit system, with four amendments. One of the amendments would require 10 percent of revenue for the system to come from non-traditional sources, not local tax sources or fares.

Indy Chamber lobbyist Mark Fisher said there’s nothing to prevent IndyGo or any future regional transit authority from being supported by private-sector donations, but he said, “This gives them more of a stick.”

What form that "stick" might take isn't spelled out in the proposed amendment, but Fisher said there have been discussions about using advertising, public-private partnerships to build transportation stops, or revenue guarantees, in which case a company might agree to buy so many passes each year.

Chairman Tim Brown, R-Crawfordsville, held off on voting, saying the Republican caucus wanted to discuss the bill, especially the issue of private-sector funding. The committee will convene and take votes later Monday.

The bill already passed the House Roads and Transportation Committee, which stripped out original language requiring 10 percent of revenue to come from a local corporate-income tax.

Other amendments before Ways and Means would remove the bill’s prohibition against the use of light rail; remove Hendricks County as one of the counties that may hold a referendum on the tax increase and join a regional transit system; and restore language about the extent of service available in a county.

The transit bill passed the Indiana Senate 28-20 earlier this month.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Where's the Analysis
    Where did the 10% come from? What is the basis for this rate? Do the mental dwarfs in the legislature ever do any analysis before they craft policies and/or propose funding sources.
  • Same old
    Same old good old boy network. Business wants mass transit, BUT We the people get to pay the bill. WAY TO GO INDIANA

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT