IBJNews

House to take up bill to create redistricting commission

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Republican-controlled Indiana House is set to take up legislation that would give a bipartisan commission the duty of drawing maps for the House, Senate and congressional districts – but the proposal is likely to undergo changes.

House Bill 1032 – authored by Rep. Jerry Torr, R-Carmel – would still give the General Assembly final say over redistricting, which occurs every 10 years. But the bill assigns a five-member commission with the job of first drawing the lines.

The Elections and Appointments Committee passed the bill Wednesday – but only after members expressed concerns that are likely to lead to amendments.

The commission would have four members – each one appointed by a leader of a legislative party caucus. That means one appointed by the leaders of the House Republicans, House Democrats, Senate Republicans and Senate Democrats.

The four commission members would then have to agree on a fifth member, who would serve as the chair. If an agreement couldn’t be reached, the chief justice of the Indiana Supreme Court would appoint the final member.

The House passed a similar bill in 2006 but it then failed in the Senate. “It is time to get the idea back out there and move it forward,” said Senate Minority Leader Tim Lanane, D-Anderson.

Several committee members including Reps. John Bartlett, D-Indianapolis, and Kreg Battles, D-Vincennes, said they thought the bill needed revisions before passing on to the House.

“The concept of the bill is great, but it needs a week,” Bartlett said.

Battles said the bill doesn’t require a unanimous vote of the commission to pass the maps; only three members would need to vote yes, which could still give power to one party.

“We have seen abuse by both parties to a certain extent (on the maps) and it would be great to have a unanimous vote,” said Torr. “We are open to suggestions to improve the bill.”

Other organizations including Common Cause and the League of Woman Voters have stepped out in support of the bill.

Julia Vaughn, policy director of Common Cause, said she would want to see Indiana base some of the bill off California’s redistricting committee.

California has 14 members on its committee. Vaughn thinks Indiana should have more commission members so it better “reflects the diversity of Indiana.”

Lawmakers also debated whether to add criteria that would be used to make the appointment.

Battles said that area of the bills needs be “tightened up” before it’s voted on by the full House.

Torr said he is open to the possibility of co-authors and said, “We have plenty of opportunity through this process to change it, and I suspect that there will be changes.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hopefully ...
    ... there is some way to redistrict the state in such a way as to eliminate Andre Carson. Good luck!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT