IDEM chief: Fed rules essentially ban new coal plants

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's top environmental regulator told a legislative panel Wednesday he's concerned tough, new federal pollution standards could make it nearly impossible for utilities to build new coal-fired power plants in the state.

The commissioner of the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Thomas Easterly, told lawmakers that the pending federal regulations will essentially rule out coal-fired power plants that currently generate much of the state's electricity.

State Sen. Jim Buck, R-Kokomo, said during Wednesday's meeting of the Environmental Quality Service Council in Indianapolis that inexpensive electricity has long made Indiana a center for manufacturing and the state risks losing key industries if that advantage goes away.

But Democratic state Sen. Jean Breaux of Indianapolis said pollution from coal-fired power plants harms Hoosiers' health. She said those effects are harder to see than a factory closing but likely cost more in the long run, The Times of Munster reported.

The Obama administration announced in September it was pressing ahead with tough requirements to limit carbon pollution from new power plants, despite protests from industry and Republicans that it would dim coal's future. The administration said global warming attributed to carbon pollution from industries is linked to public health problems, disease and extreme weather.

New federal proposals would set the first national limits on heat-trapping pollution from future power plants and move the nation to cleaner sources of energy.

The EPA said the rule changes would put it in a leadership position in battling climate change, but admitted the regulations would have no notable impact on carbon emissions.

Easterly said Indiana has made significant progress improving its air and water quality during the past decade. He said that nearly the entire state is now in compliance with federal pollution limits.

"The air is getting cleaner," Easterly said. "We are making great progress."

He said LaPorte County still does not meet air quality standards because of Chicago pollution blowing across Lake Michigan, but the levels are near the allowable maximum.


  • ?
    How is it less polluting in forcing chemicals into the ground and contaminating our aquifers? As with the misperception of electric cars, the cabon footprint is hidden and environmentalists feel better about portraying less pollution. What about all the batteries from electric cars that will need to be disposed of with lots of pollution. Also, where does the electricity come from, polluting powerplants.
  • carbon footprints and jobs leave US
    Essentially we clean up our air completely and ship all manufacturing and other jobs offshore to India,China, and other countries where the EPA has no say and polluting to the extreme in these countries will kill their own people. I suppose that Nuclear is out too. Natural Gas however and LPG, etc. cannot be prevented by them. Coal plants with scrubbers and coal liquification can eliminate almost 100 percent of pollutants. What are we to do with 500 years of coal? Perhaps t
  • No more coal pollution
    All I see in this article is good news. Better air quality, less environmental destruction.
  • Frack Gas Impact
    IDEM is complaining that Duke won't be able to use the most polluting technology for power generation? Anyway this is a moot point. Duke -like every other electric power utility - will take one look at the low cost and ready availability of natural gas from fracking and decide to build nothing but natural gas combined cycle plants for years to come. Lower cost and higher efficiency than coal and less polluting as well.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

    Subscribe to IBJ