IBJNews

IDI’s Velocity project plumbs urban neighborhoods

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Downtown Inc. hopes to gather enough information from its Velocity planning process to make recommendations about the future of downtown by the end of the year.

After kicking off the process April 23, IDI is holding a series of neighborhood roundtable meetings this month to gather public input about downtown and surrounding neighborhoods. The plan is expected to cover a wide range of topics influencing quality oif life, including housing, economic development, transportation, public spaces, and the arts.

The not-for-profit IDI has traditionally concentrated its development, advocacy and promotional activities in and around the core Mile Square area. The Velocity process recognizes that downtown's success is linked to the interests of nearby residents, according to group officials.

“I think of the surrounding neighborhoods as an asset for our future,” IDI President Sherry Seiwert said. “And I think downtown is really the anchor for our future.”

The first neighborhood meeting took place Monday on the near-south side at the Wheeler Arts Community Center. The next meeting, targeted to near-east residents, is slated for 6:30 p.m. Wednesday at the John H. Boner Community Center, 2236 E. 10th St.

The remaining schedule is as follows: for near-north residents, 6 p.m. Thursday, Harrison Center for the Arts, 1505 N. Delaware St.; for near-west residents, 6:30 p.m. June 18, George Washington High School, 2215 W. Washington St.; and for central downtown residents, 5 p.m. June 20, The Athenaeum, 401 E. Michigan St.

A survey is available at indyvelocity.com to gather input from citizens unable to attend the neighborhood meetings. IDI also has assembled several advisory committees populated by local civic and business leaders to report on elements contributing to downtown's health.

IDI is undertaking Velocity in conjunction with the city of Indianapolis’ regional center planning process. City officials conduct the plan every 20 years and provide an update at the 10-year mark, which is set for next March in the current cycle.

“We’re looking at a five- to seven-year plan,” Seiwert said of Velocity. “With the amount of changes going on downtown, we thought that would be a little more realistic.”

IDI hopes to have a draft of the plan completed within the next three months with a final report to follow by the end of the year.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Vote of no confidence
    IDI gets my vote of no confidence. Let's start by removing them from the control and marketing of Georgia Street. It's been a disaster to say the least.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT