IBJNews

Illinois lawmakers renew efforts to keep CME Group

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Illinois law makers have reached a deal on a package of bills designed to prevent financial giant CME Group Inc. from fleeing to another state, Crain's ChicagoBusiness reported Thursday afternoon.

CME met with Indianapolis officials a week ago to discuss a possible move to Indianapolis, a relocation that could bring up to 2,000 high-paying jobs to the city. Carmel also is a likely suitor for CME.

CME Group, which operates the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, NYMEX Holdings, and a majority of the Dow Jones indexes, has 2,570 employees worldwide, most of them in Chicago. In 2010, it reported more than $3 billion in revenue and more than $950 million in earnings.

According to Crain's, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in Illinois will vote next week on a pact  that will give tax incentives to CME and retail giant Sears Holding Corp. The Illinois House is scheduled to vote Monday and the Senate on Tuesday.

Late last month, the Illinois House rejected a $250 million package of tax breaks intended to keep businesses like CME and Sears from leaving the state.

Both companies have complained about recent steep increases in Illinois' corporate tax rate.

Illinois House negotiators said Thursday that they would split the package of tax-relief measures into two parts and vote on them separately, a tactic they hope will improve its chances of getting approved.

Minority Leader Tom Cross of Oswego, the top House Republican, agreed to help pass the part that offers tax relief to businesses, including Hoffman Estates-based Sears and for CME, an aide said. He is making no such promise for the other part, which would lower tax bills for families and the working poor.

The tax breaks for business would cost state government about $150 million next year and $218 million the next year, according to Cross’ office.

A tax credit for Sears would be renewed for another decade, saving the company $15 million a year. The same economic-development credit would be granted to Champion Laboratories Inc., a southern Illinois business that is moving to the Chicago suburbs, costing the state $350,000 a year.

Sears is “encouraged that [lawmakers] are returning to Springfield to consider a package that will help us remain an Illinois company,” Sears spokesman Chris Brathwaite said. “We sincerely appreciate the efforts of many members of the General Assembly over the last several months on our behalf.”

The relief for individual taxpayers would come in the form of raising the personal exemption on income taxes and then having it grow with inflation each year. It would also expand the earned-income tax credit, which lets poor families keep more of what they earn. The cost of those changes has previously been pegged at roughly $110 million a year.

The House overwhelmingly rejected the package as a whole last week. The tax credit for poor families was a major sticking point.

Some lawmakers said the state can’t afford to lose money by expanding the credit. They want to focus only on breaks for business, which they say will help the economy by creating jobs. Other lawmakers, however, insisted on even more aid to the poor, arguing that they’re struggling just as much as businesses.

Voting on the tax package in two pieces offers a couple of possible advantages.

Lawmakers may be less willing to vote “no” when facing a specific question: Do you support this particular tax incentive for businesses? Should poor families get a break on their tax bill?

“We have a better chance of passing it this way,” said Rep. John Bradley of Marion, the lead negotiator for House Democrats. “If somebody was reluctant to vote for one piece or another, they would have the option of not voting on one of the pieces.”

The other advantage is that one part could pass even if the other fails. It’s not all-or-nothing. The risk, however, is that neither will pass when the House convenes Monday.

The Senate already has approved a version of entire package. A spokesman said President John Cullerton has no objection to the idea of voting again on separate pieces when it meets Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not so fast my friend
    IL can keep the CME. Through its lack of stewardship using sound protective measures over segregated customer accounts held by its myriad of broker-dealers it is nothing more than a haven for sophisticated fraud artists. MF GLOBAL (8th largest U.S. Bankruptcy)

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT