IBJNews

Illinois lawmakers renew efforts to keep CME Group

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Illinois law makers have reached a deal on a package of bills designed to prevent financial giant CME Group Inc. from fleeing to another state, Crain's ChicagoBusiness reported Thursday afternoon.

CME met with Indianapolis officials a week ago to discuss a possible move to Indianapolis, a relocation that could bring up to 2,000 high-paying jobs to the city. Carmel also is a likely suitor for CME.

CME Group, which operates the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, NYMEX Holdings, and a majority of the Dow Jones indexes, has 2,570 employees worldwide, most of them in Chicago. In 2010, it reported more than $3 billion in revenue and more than $950 million in earnings.

According to Crain's, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle in Illinois will vote next week on a pact  that will give tax incentives to CME and retail giant Sears Holding Corp. The Illinois House is scheduled to vote Monday and the Senate on Tuesday.

Late last month, the Illinois House rejected a $250 million package of tax breaks intended to keep businesses like CME and Sears from leaving the state.

Both companies have complained about recent steep increases in Illinois' corporate tax rate.

Illinois House negotiators said Thursday that they would split the package of tax-relief measures into two parts and vote on them separately, a tactic they hope will improve its chances of getting approved.

Minority Leader Tom Cross of Oswego, the top House Republican, agreed to help pass the part that offers tax relief to businesses, including Hoffman Estates-based Sears and for CME, an aide said. He is making no such promise for the other part, which would lower tax bills for families and the working poor.

The tax breaks for business would cost state government about $150 million next year and $218 million the next year, according to Cross’ office.

A tax credit for Sears would be renewed for another decade, saving the company $15 million a year. The same economic-development credit would be granted to Champion Laboratories Inc., a southern Illinois business that is moving to the Chicago suburbs, costing the state $350,000 a year.

Sears is “encouraged that [lawmakers] are returning to Springfield to consider a package that will help us remain an Illinois company,” Sears spokesman Chris Brathwaite said. “We sincerely appreciate the efforts of many members of the General Assembly over the last several months on our behalf.”

The relief for individual taxpayers would come in the form of raising the personal exemption on income taxes and then having it grow with inflation each year. It would also expand the earned-income tax credit, which lets poor families keep more of what they earn. The cost of those changes has previously been pegged at roughly $110 million a year.

The House overwhelmingly rejected the package as a whole last week. The tax credit for poor families was a major sticking point.

Some lawmakers said the state can’t afford to lose money by expanding the credit. They want to focus only on breaks for business, which they say will help the economy by creating jobs. Other lawmakers, however, insisted on even more aid to the poor, arguing that they’re struggling just as much as businesses.

Voting on the tax package in two pieces offers a couple of possible advantages.

Lawmakers may be less willing to vote “no” when facing a specific question: Do you support this particular tax incentive for businesses? Should poor families get a break on their tax bill?

“We have a better chance of passing it this way,” said Rep. John Bradley of Marion, the lead negotiator for House Democrats. “If somebody was reluctant to vote for one piece or another, they would have the option of not voting on one of the pieces.”

The other advantage is that one part could pass even if the other fails. It’s not all-or-nothing. The risk, however, is that neither will pass when the House convenes Monday.

The Senate already has approved a version of entire package. A spokesman said President John Cullerton has no objection to the idea of voting again on separate pieces when it meets Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not so fast my friend
    IL can keep the CME. Through its lack of stewardship using sound protective measures over segregated customer accounts held by its myriad of broker-dealers it is nothing more than a haven for sophisticated fraud artists. MF GLOBAL (8th largest U.S. Bankruptcy)

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT