IBJNews

Impact Racing accused of counterfeiting safety labels

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A group that sets standards for motorsports equipment intends to yank its approval of gear produced by Impact Racing LLC, the Brownsburg company owned by industry pioneer Bill Simpson, amid allegations of counterfeiting.

SFI Foundation Inc. has announced that it will decertify all Impact products, excluding helmets, effective April 27. That means drivers would not be allowed to use Impact's gloves, boots, suits or restraints at tracks that require those items to be SFI-certified.

Tracks' requirements vary, but SFI's reach in the racing world is extensive. The body includes 93 member manufacturers and affiliates, including NASCAR and the National Hot Rod Association.

As of late Wednesday, Impact was trying to head off the decertification and a court order to halt the sale of goods bearing the SFI label.

“Impact strongly denies it's done anything wrongful. Its products are safe,” said Ed Harris, attorney at the Indianapolis office of Cincinnati-based law firm Taft Stettinius and Hollister LLP.

A hearing was set for 3:30 p.m. Thursday in federal court in Indianapolis on SFI's motion for a temporary restraining order. SFI, based in Poway, Calif., filed a lawsuit Friday.

The not-for-profit group, which sets minimum performance standards for all types of racing equipment, claims that between November 2005 and August 2008, Impact hired an Asian manufacturer to produce look-alike SFI labels and put on them on seatbelts, arm restraints, fire suits, head socks, gloves and boots. SFI's complaint includes an affidavit from a former Impact employee, Darren Swisher.

Simpson started Impact Racing in 2002 after fending off rumors that a seatbelt made by his former company, Simpson Performance Products, played a role in Dale Earnhardt's death. The NASCAR driver died after a crash in the final lap of the 2001 Daytona 500.

Impact has its headquarters and a showroom at 1531 Northfield Drive in Brownsburg and factory stores in Mooresville, N.C., and Irwindale, Calif., according to the company Web site. The site includes video of the famously demonstrative Simpson set ablaze in one of his own racing suits to show its protective qualities.

Before the Earnhardt controversy, Simpson was known for inventing the parachute that slows drag-race cars. Harris would not disclose other details about Impact, including the current number of employees.

SFI's counterfeit-label claim is not the only such allegation Simpson faces. Hans Performance Products,  an Atlanta company that makes head and neck restraints, says Impact hired an Asian manufacturer to copy its helmet component, then sold and distributed it under the Hans logo.

Hans' parent company, the privately held Hubbard/Downing Inc., filed a suit in September in federal court in Atlanta. The SFI Foundation joined that suit as an intervening party.

Hans CEO Mark Stiles said it took a court order to stop Impact from selling the look-alike components.

“We were surprised to have to take the action we did,” said Stiles, who noted that Impact has become a significant player in the dirt-track and drag-racing market.

Hans makes a neck restraint that rests on the drivers shoulders and attaches to either side of the helmet with a tether and metal posts or clips. The company doesn't make its own helmets, so it distributes the helmet posts through authorized manufacturers. Stiles said Impact is not one of those manufacturers.

A former Impact manager tipped Hans off to the copies, and the company says it easily found them in use at several NASCAR tracks. The counterfeits were distinguishable, Hans claims, because they were made with a non-magnetic metal.

A deposition recently filed in the case quotes Simpson admitting that the components Impact used on its helmets were “copies.” “The only reason ... why they would be counterfeit is because somebody put 'HANS' on there,” he said, according to court records.

Impact Racing is making a similar distinction about SFI's complaint. A statement to customers on the company's  Web site says, “The allegation from SFI is in relation to the actual SFI tag only. We suggest at this time to continue to use your equipment, which is safe and has been certified and do not have anyone replace your tags on your products.”

Both SFI and Hans claim Impact's use of counterfeit labels could affect driver safety. In its lawsuit, Hans alleges that Impact doesn't have the means or equipment for testing head and neck restraints. SFI says Impact has also bought and used legitimate labels, so it's not sure which items meet industry standards.

Despite the allegations, Simpson has some loyal customers. Mike Hull, managing director at Target Ganassi Racing, said his drivers and crew use Impact fire suits and other gear. “There's nothing wrong with the quality of his product, or the safety of his product.”

Hull was aware of both lawsuits, and he said he didn't think Simpson would order up counterfeit goods.

“Safety is one of those things, you just don't do things like that. You make sure your product is above the mark all the time," he said. "You have to abide by industry standards. You try to go past that with everything you do.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • IMPACT PRESS RELEASE 6/21/2010
    On June 21st, 2010, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana issued a ruling granting, in part, Impact Racing's motion to preliminarily enjoin SFI Foundation from terminating Impact's Contract of Participation with SFI until SFI "does so in a manner that is unquestionably 'substantively rational and procedurally fair." According to the Court, "Impact has made a strong showing of likely success on the merits" and "until Impact is afforded fair procedure, Impact could suffer irreparable harm, if it has not already."

    This means that Impact's Contracts with SFI will not terminate on June 22, 2010, as SFI had previously announced. All Impact products manufactured in 2009 and 2010 currently certified as SFI-compliant remain certified. In addition, after June 22, 2010, Impact can continue to manufacture and certify its products as SFI-compliant.
  • notice the wording
    If you read closely, SFI is sying it is the label that makes you safe, not the product.
  • Tell that to...
    Richard Putz:

    http://www.insidetopalcohol.com/showthread.php?t=22813
  • Hearing Results?
    So what was the result of the April 1 hearing? I can see from the docket report that SFI filed a motion for expedited discovery, but there are no orders on file (yet). Anybody know what happened?
  • Illegals Still Work There
    Brownsburg's factory is staffed by Hispanics and I strongly suspect Mr. Simpson continues to use illegals. So is it illegals making copies? Where is the INS???
  • Or...
    ...a pattern of playing fast and loose with the rules.

    So the rules are, in order to use the licensed mark of either HANS or SFI, you have to have the device tested to their standards and document the tests.

    Seems reasonable to me. If I were a race driver or his/her family, I wouldn't want to hear that Impact's gear "was just as good as" the standard. I'd want proof in the form of test results.
  • Hmmmmm
    Sounds like a disgruntled "former" employee to me!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

ADVERTISEMENT