IBJOpinion

DINING: Indian restaurant offers twist on traditional buffet concept

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

“We already have India Garden.” So said a friend when I told him of Haveli (235 S. Meridian St., 280-7648), the new downtown Indian restaurant.
 

ae-apb-haveli02-15col.jpg The former Sushi on the Rocks location now houses a worthwhile Indian buffet with unique menu options and warm Naan delivered to your table. (IBJ Photo/ Aaron P. Bernstein)

But what my friend’s comment missed is, a) all Indian restaurants are not alike, b) we’ve got plenty of sandwich shops but you didn’t hear many complaints when Potbelly opened on Monument Circle, c) even in a midsize downtown area, many workers and visitors stick to a few-block radius, and d) you can never have too much naan.

Housed in the former site of Ice Lounge, Sushi on the Rocks, and others, Haveli hasn’t done much with the interior of this oft-turned-over spot. It’s clean and bright but not overtly atmospheric. We visited for lunch, which, true to Indian- restaurant form, is offered as a buffet ($7.99, but look around for coupons).

One difference from many other Indian buffets is that here, the naan—a choice of plain or garlic—is delivered hot to your table rather than kept warm on the buffet. This may cut down on the slices you take, but certainly increases the pleasure.

Normally, Indian buffets mean standards such as Chicken Tikka Masala and Paneer Palak. Haveli has those, of course, but also boosts the options with Matar Panir (peas in a mildly spiced cheese sauce); Chana Masala, thick with chickpeas; and Goat Curry in a mild gravy, which might turn off the least adventurous in your dining party but offered nothing to fear and much to enjoy.

We didn’t find a dud among the Saag Paneer, Dal Makhni and other offerings, and the Tandoori Chicken offered a safe-haven option for those less intrepid meal companions. Added bonus: The chutneys also tasted fresh and flavorful, with Onion Chutney and a delicate Mint Chutney standing out.

Probably the most striking point was that the meal broke from an unfortunate norm with buffet food—the entrees were adequately cooked. That’s remarkable when you consider the dishes were heavy on proteins that easily dry out when over-exposed to heat lamps. And perhaps it has something to do with the light, but even after two trips to the trough—and, OK, another for a big bowl of syrupy Gulab Jamun balls for dessert—all the food felt less heavy than at other Indian restaurants.

There is an extensive dinner menu (mostly in the $8.95-$13.95 range) with multiple biryanis (rice dishes), seafood offerings, a flock of lamb choices, Indo-Chinese choices, and clay-oven Tandoori specialties, but those will have to wait for another time.•

—Lou Harry

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT