IBJNews

Indiana announces proposed Duke Energy settlement

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Duke Energy Corp. has agreed to cap the cost of its troubled coal-gasification plant in southwestern Indiana at $2.6 billion, or about $700 million less than the expected cost of construction, as part of a proposed settlement announced Monday.

Duke Energy and the Indiana agency representing utility ratepayers, the Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, announced they had reached an agreement with the Duke Energy Industrial Group, which consists of six of the utility's large industrial customers, and Nucor Steel. The agreement still must be approved by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.

Under the plan, customers' rates will increase by 14.5 percent, Duke Energy said. Without the deal, rates would have increased by 22 percent.

Kerwin Olson, executive director of the Citizen Action Coalition, said the settlement came as a shock to him. He said the power plant should never have been approved.

"The settlement on the surface appears to give Duke Energy far too much. The terms appear to be completely unacceptable to CAC," he said.

The Office of Utility Consumer Counselor had previously criticized Duke, saying it had concealed vital information from regulators about the plant, which has been beset by nearly $1 billion in cost overruns the company has sought to pass along to its customers. Duke has argued that it has managed the project prudently and should be allowed to pass on the cost overruns.

Critics have said emails obtained by The Indianapolis Star in August show an inappropriately close relationship between Indiana regulators and Duke Energy. The emails showed the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission chairman recommended that Duke Energy hire his personal choice to lead its operations in the state.

The relationship spurred a criminal investigation. Former regulatory commission chairman David Lott Hardy was indicted in December on charges he allowed the panel's top lawyer to keep overseeing cases involving Duke Energy even though he knew the attorney was trying to land a job at Duke.

Hardy has filed a motion in Marion Superior Court to dismiss an amended indictment against him, claiming he did nothing criminal.

Duke Energy Indiana President Doug Esamann says the agreement meets two objectives, reducing what Indiana customers will pay in rates and resolving uncertainty for Duke Energy shareholders.

"We're now in the home stretch of completing a facility that will modernize our electric system and provide Indiana with cleaner power to meet increasingly strict federal environmental regulations," he said.

The massive coal-gasification plant near the southwestern Indiana town of Edwardsport will convert coal into a synthetic gas processed to remove pollutants such as mercury and sulfur. The gas is then burned in a traditional turbine power plant to produce electricity.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bad Deal For Us
    Indiana Utility Regulators Reach Deal With Duke Energy That Is Not Good Enough

    http://www.advanceindiana.com/
  • BANANA REPUBLIC
    Why should ratepayers pay for a publicly traded companys' gross mismanagement, misconduct, misrepresentation and malfeasance!

    If the IURC approves any overruns they have then turned Indiana into a Banana Republic. These clowns went over by $1,000,000,000!!!

    Legalized Extortion!!!!!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT