Indiana candidates scrap about farm bill failure

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Congress' failure to pass a farm bill became a top talking point for Indiana candidates this week as Hoosier farmers continue to suffer through the worst drought in decades.

Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock chastised federal lawmakers Thursday for not approving more federal aid for farmers before they left on their August recess.

Meanwhile, Democratic gubernatorial John Gregg criticized his Republican opponent, U.S. Rep. Mike Pence, for not doing more on farmers' behalf.

"He needs to get back out to Washington, D.C., and provide some relief for the farmers and small communities rather than spending the next five weeks here in Indiana campaigning for governor," Gregg said Thursday. "He's got a job, he needs to finish that one before he starts this one."

The two congressmen running at the top of the ticket in this election cycle, Pence and U.S. Rep. Joe Donnelly, who is running against Mourdock, both voted in favor of temporary drought relief earlier this month.

That legislation also stalled amid a standoff between chambers in Congress.

The House approved a one-year, $383 million in disaster relief plan, but Congress went home before the Senate acted on the bill. The Senate had previously passed a disaster aid package as part of a five-year farm bill, but GOP leaders in the House refused to bring that to a vote because they worried many Republicans would object to the nearly $80 billion included in the bill for the food stamp program. That means no aid is likely to be approved until Congress returns in early September.

Donnelly has called on others in Congress to end the recess to work on the farm bill. Pence spokeswoman Christy Denault said the congressman supported Indiana farmers with his Aug. 2 vote in favor of the emergency drought relief.

But election year rhetoric aside, Indiana Farm Bureau President Don Villwock said it's hard to make a definitive statement that Hoosier farmers need a farm bill passed immediately. Unlike states in the Great Plains, which have benefitted from aid for cattle producers and crops not largely grown in Indiana, Hoosier farmers would not get much additional assistance from a farm bill, he said.

"In that regard, the relief is not as critical to our producers," he said.

The farm bill is important for Hoosiers in another way, however: it would allow them to secure crop insurance in 2013.

Indiana's candidates for lieutenant governor debated agriculture issues Wednesday, scrapping in part on the farm bill. After Democratic candidate Vi Simpson argued that Congress should return immediately to approve a farm bill, Libertarian Brad Klopfenstein hit back saying it should be called a "food stamp bill" because of the millions of dollars it includes for that program.

The farm bill has long existed as a compromise between urban lawmakers who represent food stamp recipients and rural lawmakers representing farmers, but the food assistance has grown increasingly over the decades to where it dwarves the farm aid in the measure, Villwock said.

In the past, lawmakers approved it the measure based more on regional interest than partisan divides. This is the first time partisanship has blocked the farm bill, he said.


  • Farm Bill
    The House themselves are looking at better stopping self-serving abusive items and cutting costs to insure our country has a better future with hopefully less debt. The majority of the leaders in the House understand that potentially all bills which come up for renewal need to be closely reviewed and have any extraneous trash eliminated to cut costs. Also they seem to better understand that items needed should be in separate bills and not have a Farm Drought issue hampered by SNAP food stamp bickering. The Senate has not passed a budget and before any Senator plays any “petty party blame game” they should first insure that any extraneous trash is cleaned from the Senate Farm Bill. The Senate Farm Bill wants to in essence “grandfather” rural communities who no longer qualify as rural and are self-sufficient. The purpose of rural programs is to help very small struggling communities grow and become self-sufficient, not to become a Welfare System for self-sufficient communities who have already received past benefits wanting more. Our Country and Citizens can no longer afford such self-serving actions being added to current or future legislation. Ladies and gentlemen our country is broke and going more broke by the minute. We need individuals to stand up and make tough decisions and we ourselves need to be willing to offer to our legislator options regarding what we feel is necessary and what we truly believe can be cut. If we have legislators who are going to play any “blame games” when they have their own legislative trash in bills within their own backyard, then potentially they need to be replaced with someone who is willing to make the tough choices. We can no longer afford to continue down this socialism path which is causing chaos in European countries overseas. Our founding fathers knew the best government was a Republic which offered freedom of choice, the question then becomes, “How wise were the choices made?” Our government backed by We the People can either make or break this great Nation depending on our choices made and how they affect us both now and in the future. Let's please choose wisely ...

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ