IBJNews

Indiana court approves disputed blood in fatal crash

Associated Press
September 12, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A blood sample from an Indianapolis police officer accused of drunken driving and causing a fatal crash can be used as evidence in the criminal case against him, an appeals court ruled Wednesday, overturning a lower court ruling barring the sample due to concerns over how was obtained.

The Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that a Marion County judge erred in determining the blood drawn from Officer David Bisard's after the Aug. 6, 2010, crash was inadmissible. Bisard's cruiser slammed into two motorcycles stopped at a light, killing 30-year-old Eric Wells and critically injuring two other people.

The sample pegged Bisard's blood-alcohol content at 0.19 percent, or more than twice the legal limit. But then-Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi stunned the victims and public when he dropped drunken driving charges against Bisard in August 2010, just days after they were filed. Brizzi said the blood test was improperly administered and he didn't think it could be admitted as evidence.

His successor, Prosecutor Terry Curry, refiled the drunken driving charges against Bisard early in 2011. Marion County Judge Grant Hawkins ruled in May 2011 that the first blood test couldn't be used as evidence of drunken driving, citing the same reasons Brizzi had. Hawkins said the test wasn't completed according to state law because no clear medical protocol was followed and the blood was drawn by a medical assistant, a profession that isn't included among those the law lists as allowed to draw blood in drunken driving cases.

But he said it could be used to support a reckless homicide charge against Bisard.

The appellate court legislators clearly hadn't intended for key evidence to be thrown out because of a technicality.

"We conclude that the medical assistant did in fact draw the blood in a way that followed physician-approved protocols, and that the statutes cited by Bisard do not reflect that the General Assembly intended to suppress blood evidence taken in a medical facility by a trained operator in the presence of the suspect's lawyer. We therefore reverse," Senior Judge Randall Shepard wrote in the 21-page opinion.

Curry called the ruling "a significant step" in the case and said his office decided to refile the charges because he believed that "there was a very viable argument that the blood test was appropriate."

Curry said he expected Bisard's lawyers to ask the Indiana Supreme Court to hear the case, but the justices would have the option of whether or not to accept.

Bisard's lawyer, John Kautzman, said had not yet had a chance to review the ruling.

Wells' father, Aaron Wells, said he was gratified that the court clarified a law that legal experts found confusing. But he said he didn't expect a resolution to the case anytime soon.

"It's not over," he said Wednesday by phone from his home in Deerfield, Fla. "It's a long way from being over."

Police officers' handling of the crash scene and the decision to drop the drunken driving charge stirred public mistrust and allegations of a cover-up that linger two years later.

Critics said it was hard to believe that officers at the scene hadn't realized Bisard had been drinking. Hundreds of motorcyclists flocked to downtown Indianapolis in the weekends after the crash to protest against Bisard and to hold vigils for the victims. Two official investigations into the handling of evidence and the scene resulted in disciplinary action or demotion for several high-ranking officers, including the police chief.

"We knew from the beginning in our hearts that there was something very, very wrong, and I think the community knew there was something wrong," said Aaron Wells.

Curry, the prosecutor, said he didn't know whether the appellate court ruling would ease public concern over the handling of the case.

"At the end of the day, our ultimate goal was simple, to be able to present this case fully and fairly so the families knew they had their day in court," he said.

Wednesday's ruling did not involve a second blood sample that prosecutors later sought to have tested. That second vial of Bisard's blood also was disputed after it was mishandled by police evidence technicians. Hawkins has not yet ruled whether that second sample can be used as evidence against Bisard.

Curry said both the original vial and the second vial will be retested.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Time's up!
    Yes, Mr. Wells, the community DOES know there's something very wrong, and we're angry, too. Time for David Bisard to get off paid administrative leave and go directly to jail.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT