Indiana House backs school voucher expansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Kindergartners and some other students in Indiana would be immediately eligible for the state's private school voucher program under an expansion plan the House approved Thursday.

The vote came soon after the Republican House speaker shelved a bill that would have shifted handling of voucher applications away from the new Democratic state schools superintendent, who opposes the program.

Representatives voted 57-36 largely along party lines to approve the Republican-backed bill expanding voucher eligibility, advancing it to the Senate.

The bill makes several exemptions from the requirement included in the 2011 law that all students spend at least one year in public schools before becoming eligible for a voucher. It eliminates that requirement for siblings of current voucher students, for children in military and foster families and for children with special needs.

Democrats argued it was irresponsible to expand the program when it is only in its second year and a lawsuit challenging it is awaiting a ruling from the state Supreme Court.

"Still we are moving ahead," said Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary. "Doesn't matter if the program hasn't been evaluated, doesn't matter that it hasn't been reviewed, doesn't matter what the court says. We're just gonna do it."

The bill had originally sought to eliminate the one-year public school requirement, which would make all current private school students eligible for vouchers if their families met income limits.

More than 9,000 students are receiving vouchers averaging nearly $4,100 each this school year — and House Republican budget writers decided that the opening up it up to potentially thousands of more non-public school students would be too great an extra cost.

Rep. Todd Huston, R-Fishers, said he was proud to send his children to public schools but maintained that the Legislature should do what it can to help families who believe a private school is best for their children.

"The stories that we hear from parents are amazing," Huston said. "The stories we hear from kids are amazing."

The fate of the expansion in the Republican-controlled Senate is uncertain. Some of its leaders have questioned making exceptions from the 2011 compromise on the one-year public school requirement.

Rep. Terri Austin, D-Anderson, held up a poster board during Thursday's debate with a quote from then-Gov. Mitch Daniels saying public schools would first get a chance to win over students and parents.

"Let's not make this the year that we renege on our agreements and promises," Austin said. "We can give it a few more years and see if it works."

Democrats had also been fighting a proposal advanced by House Education Committee Chairman Robert Behning, R-Indianapolis, that would have shifted voucher administration from the Department of Education to an agency under Republican Gov. Mike Pence.

Behning had cited concerns about when the agency would begin accepting voucher applications and about schools Superintendent Glenda Ritz's involvement in the lawsuit against the voucher program before she won election in November.

Behning said he agreed with the decision by House Speaker Brian Bosma to pull the bill from consideration because Ritz told him the Department of Education would begin accepting voucher applications in March.

Ritz said Wednesday she didn't believe she should be treated differently than any previous state superintendent. She said she would follow her oath of office and properly implement any laws regardless of her personal feelings.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...