The leader of Indiana's House Democrats hinted Wednesday that party lawmakers may walk out for the second year in a row
to oppose the same Republican-led right-to-work bill thwarted last year by their five-week boycott.
House Democratic Leader Patrick Bauer said that his caucus plans to meet Wednesday to debate how to handle the GOP proposal
that would make Indiana the 23rd state to bar businesses and private unions from mandating that workers pay union fees.
Bauer led the walkout last year with most Democrats abandoning their jobs to flee to Illinois. But new fines and lawmakers
concerned about re-election in 2012 have made the group wary of another such ploy. A few hours before the session started,
Bauer referenced the U.S. Senate's filibuster as the minority party's best tool for taking on the majority. He said
a similar effort in Indiana would require the vast majority of his caucus to act in unison.
"Here, it takes a caucus of at least a substantial minority," he said.
After Democrats walked out last year, House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, and his Senate counterpart, Senate President
Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, passed new fines of $1,000 a day on each lawmaker who leaves the Statehouse for more than
three days in a row.
The fines were challenged in court, but a Superior Court judge ruled the Indiana General Assembly has the constitutional
authority to pass laws or its own internal rules, including how it compels attendance or imposes fines.
Rep. Scott Reske, D-Pendleton, said he feels the $1,000-a-day fine is expensive, and he hinted that some Democrats might
not push for a walkout.
"You don't use the same tactic twice," he said.
But Rep. Craig Frye, D-Mishawaka, called a walkout "the only way" to block the bill.
Hundreds of union members packed the hall outside the room where Democrats met Wednesday afternoon and cheered each member
as they walked into the caucus meeting.
House Democrats could also decide to continue meeting in their caucus room indefinitely, effectively denying Republicans
the numbers needed to conduct business without actually leaving the state. It is unclear, though, whether that would be as
effective in blocking the right-to-work bill.
Bosma said Tuesday he had not taken a tally, but is confident he can lock in the votes he needs to pass the measure.
Indiana's Senate Democrats lack the numbers needed to block the measure in their chamber — Indiana's Senate
has no filibuster — where they are outnumbered by Republicans 37-13. Thus the focus has been squarely on the House Democrats.
Bosma and Long set a Friday hearing for both the Senate and House versions of the right-to-work bill. The respective measures
will move through both chambers simultaneously.
"We have options so that we can react to whatever Rep. Bauer and his team have planned," Bosma said Tuesday.
A last-ditch option for House Democrats is trying to sway at least 10 Republicans to their side. Republicans hold a 60-40
majority in the House and would need at least 51 votes to pass the measure.
The Indiana AFL-CIO has been airing TV and radio ads targeting Republicans who may be vulnerable in the 2012 elections if
they vote in favor of right to work.
Bosma and Gov. Mitch Daniels have been airing their own ads throughout the state in support of the measure, and the National
Right to Work Committee has sent staffers to the state to build grass-roots support for the measure.

















IBJ Conversations
21 Comments
Add Comment
Where does the concept of non-union members paying union dues or sometimes called fees (always less than the full union dues)come from anyway? Could it be that labor laws require the exclusive representative (the union) to represent all employees, union and non union alike, in a labor dispute and that all employees enjoy fully any pay and benefits negotiated by the union?
How about this approach? Let's just institute a two tiered pay and benefits approach and change existing labor laws requiring equal representation and eliminate the so called "right to work" issue. Those employees represented by a union would receive their bargained level of pay and benefits and the remaining employees would receive what the employer decided that they were worth. Then we would really see if union representation worked. What do you think?
I recommend for your reading and consideration today's Morton Marcus article entitled "Legislators do state no favor with right-to-work proposal."
I hope that the entire legislature slows down - think of the impact.
Today, the rich will be the only ones allowed to use the tactic of walkout.