Indiana House Democrats might end boycott Monday

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House's Democratic leader said Friday his boycotting members are willing to return at "high noon" Monday to begin debating a contentious right-to-work bill, although the ongoing dispute over whether a statewide referendum on the issue is constitutional could prevent legislative action.

The bill would ban contracts between companies and labor unions that force nonmembers to pay dues.

Democrats filed a proposed amendment early Friday that would send the law, if approved by the Republican-dominated Legislature, to a statewide referendum vote in November. The amendment tries to skirt the state constitution, which requires all laws be enacted by the Legislature, by having the law take effect the day before the Nov. 6 election and then allowing it to expire the next day if voters don't endorse it.

Minority Leader Patrick Bauer said Democrats would work over the weekend to address questions about the legality of their proposal.

"If you want to make it high noon Monday, we will be here," Bauer nearly shouted as Republican Speaker Brian Bosma looked on from atop the House rostrum a few feet away.

Bauer and Bosma earlier had a tense 10-minute exchange on the House floor during which Bauer pressed for an agreement that the referendum wouldn't be regarded as unconstitutional.

Bosma replied he couldn't guarantee the referendum proposal was constitutional, but assured Bauer that the House would vote on the proposal if Democrats returned to the floor to debate the right-to-work bill.

Bauer and five Democrats not taking part in the boycott were the only ones of the floor for the second attempt to start a session, continuing to leave too few members present for the House to conduct business.

Bosma said he believes the right-to-work issue should be decided in the Legislature and he didn't know or care whether the Democratic proposal for a referendum would be constitutional.

Democrats have complained that they needed time to draft a revised referendum proposal after a review by legislative lawyers came out this week that found the state constitution didn't allow for referendums to the enactment of laws.

Majority Republicans voted for a third straight day to impose $1,000-a-day fines on the boycotting Democrats, even though Marion County Judge David Dreyer issued an order Thursday blocking those fines from being deducted from the state paychecks of three boycotters who have sued.

The state Senate also started debating proposed amendments to its version of the bill on Friday, with outnumbered Senate Democrats also expected to push for a referendum vote.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing