IBJNews

Indiana House panel backs sentencing-laws overhaul

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A sweeping plan to overhaul Indiana's criminal sentencing laws cleared its first hurdle in the Legislature on Wednesday with the support of law-enforcement groups that had scuttled similar efforts the past two years.

The Indiana House Courts and Criminal Committee voted 13-0 to approve the bill and send it to the full House for consideration.

Supporters of the plan say it aims to direct more people convicted of low-level felonies to work release and other local programs rather than sending them to prison. It would also require those convicted of the most-serious crimes to spend more time in prison.

Leaders of prosecutor and police groups spoke in favor of the proposal, which they helped develop with a legislative commission that reviewed the criminal code over the past few years.

Provisions of the plan include dropping the state's current four-tier system of felonies, which range from class A, the most-serious felonies with the longest sentences, to class D. It would be replaced by a six-tier system, with class 1 being most serious and ranging down to class 6.

Supporters say the changes will allow the punishment ranges to be more refined and appropriate for the severity of the crime.

"We've tried to separate the people we're mad at from the people we're afraid of — and the people we're afraid of, we're hitting hard," said the legislation's sponsor, Rep. Greg Steuerwald, R-Avon. "The people we're just mad at, the lower-level class 6 felons, we're trying to set up in community corrections programs."

Then-Gov. Mitch Daniels pushed during the 2011 legislative session for a sentencing overhaul aimed at reducing the state's prison population. But that plan failed after prosecutors maintained it was too soft on crime and pushed for tougher sentencing provisions.

Another provision of the new proposal would require that felons serve at least 75 percent of their sentences, up from the 50 percent or less that prisoners might now serve if they earn good-time and education credits while behind bars.

The sentencing ranges for the current class A felonies would remain the same for class 1 felonies, 20 years to 50 years in prison.

The sentence range for class B felonies is currently six years to 20 years. Under the new plan, class 2 felonies would carry sentences of between 10 years and 30 years, and class 3 crimes would carry three-year to 20-year sentences.

However, Larry Landis, executive director of the Indiana Public Defender Council, said he worried the changes would leave the state Department of Correction with too many longtime inmates and not meet the original goal of reducing prison costs.

"My concern is we've got the sentences now too high, that we're not going see that savings to reinvest," Landis said. "There's really very little in this bill that's going to reinvest money in the communities to take care of those low-level offenders who are going to be taken out of the DOC and stay in the counties."

Democratic Rep. Linda Lawson of Hammond, a former police officer, voted in favor of the bill in the committee. She said she didn't share concerns about the plan possibly increasing the prison population.

"We need to put the very worst away and throw away the key," Lawson said. "But we don't need to house people who are viable citizens who aren't committing violent crimes, crimes against people."

The sentencing changes wouldn't take effect until July 2014, which would give legislators time next year to make changes to how specific crimes are classified, said Republican Sen. Brent Steele of Bedford, who helped develop the proposal.

"It is important we at least get this skeleton through before we start tightening the nuts and bolts down," Steele said. "This thing needs to just get through and then we'll leave next year for however people want to fight it out."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • We'll See
    Time for the conservative crowd to put up. My life is surrounded by perfectly legal things that "I'm mad at". The sooner we can exclude people from the web of the criminal-industrial justice complex, the sooner we can address real crime problems. We need to keep real violent offenders in prison for meaningful terms, and keep those we "don't like" out of our incredibly expensive court system.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am a Lyft driver who is a licensed CDL professional driver. ALL Lyft drivers take pride in providing quality service to the Indianapolis and surrounding areas, and we take the safety of our passengers and the public seriously.(passengers are required to put seat belts on when they get in our cars) We do go through background checks, driving records are checked as are the personal cars we drive, (these are OUR private cars we use) Unlike taxi cabs and their drivers Lyft (and yes Uber) provide passengers with a clean car inside and out, a friendly and courteous driver, and who is dressed appropriately and is groomed appropriately. I go so far as to offer mints, candy and/or small bottle of water to the my customers. It's a mutual respect between driver and passenger. With Best Regards

  2. to be the big fish in the little pond of IRL midwest racin' when yer up against Racin' Gardner

  3. In the first sentance "As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss are build quality & price." need a way to edit

  4. As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss is build quality & price. First none of these places is worth $1100 for a one bedroom. Downtown Carmel or Keystone at the Crossing in Indy. It doesn't matter. All require you to get in your car to get just about anywhere you need to go. I'm in one of the Carmel apartments now where after just 2.5 short years one of the kitchen cabinet doors is crooked and lawn and property maintenance seems to be lacking my old Indianapolis apartment which cost $300 less. This is one of the new star apartments. As they keep building throughout the area "deals" will start popping up creating shoppers. If your property is falling apart after year 3 what will it look like after year 5 or 10??? Why would one stay here if they could move to a new Broad Ripple in 2 to 3 years or another part of the Far Northside?? The complexes aren't going to let the "poor" move in without local permission so that's not that problem, but it the occupancy rate drops suddenly because the "Young" people moved back to Indy then look out.

  5. Why are you so concerned about Ace hardware? I don't understand why anyone goes there! Every time ive gone in the past, they don't have what I need and I end up going to the big box stores. I understand the service aspect and that they try to be helpful but if they are going to survive I think they might need to carry more specialty parts.

ADVERTISEMENT