IBJNews

Indiana House panel backs sentencing-laws overhaul

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A sweeping plan to overhaul Indiana's criminal sentencing laws cleared its first hurdle in the Legislature on Wednesday with the support of law-enforcement groups that had scuttled similar efforts the past two years.

The Indiana House Courts and Criminal Committee voted 13-0 to approve the bill and send it to the full House for consideration.

Supporters of the plan say it aims to direct more people convicted of low-level felonies to work release and other local programs rather than sending them to prison. It would also require those convicted of the most-serious crimes to spend more time in prison.

Leaders of prosecutor and police groups spoke in favor of the proposal, which they helped develop with a legislative commission that reviewed the criminal code over the past few years.

Provisions of the plan include dropping the state's current four-tier system of felonies, which range from class A, the most-serious felonies with the longest sentences, to class D. It would be replaced by a six-tier system, with class 1 being most serious and ranging down to class 6.

Supporters say the changes will allow the punishment ranges to be more refined and appropriate for the severity of the crime.

"We've tried to separate the people we're mad at from the people we're afraid of — and the people we're afraid of, we're hitting hard," said the legislation's sponsor, Rep. Greg Steuerwald, R-Avon. "The people we're just mad at, the lower-level class 6 felons, we're trying to set up in community corrections programs."

Then-Gov. Mitch Daniels pushed during the 2011 legislative session for a sentencing overhaul aimed at reducing the state's prison population. But that plan failed after prosecutors maintained it was too soft on crime and pushed for tougher sentencing provisions.

Another provision of the new proposal would require that felons serve at least 75 percent of their sentences, up from the 50 percent or less that prisoners might now serve if they earn good-time and education credits while behind bars.

The sentencing ranges for the current class A felonies would remain the same for class 1 felonies, 20 years to 50 years in prison.

The sentence range for class B felonies is currently six years to 20 years. Under the new plan, class 2 felonies would carry sentences of between 10 years and 30 years, and class 3 crimes would carry three-year to 20-year sentences.

However, Larry Landis, executive director of the Indiana Public Defender Council, said he worried the changes would leave the state Department of Correction with too many longtime inmates and not meet the original goal of reducing prison costs.

"My concern is we've got the sentences now too high, that we're not going see that savings to reinvest," Landis said. "There's really very little in this bill that's going to reinvest money in the communities to take care of those low-level offenders who are going to be taken out of the DOC and stay in the counties."

Democratic Rep. Linda Lawson of Hammond, a former police officer, voted in favor of the bill in the committee. She said she didn't share concerns about the plan possibly increasing the prison population.

"We need to put the very worst away and throw away the key," Lawson said. "But we don't need to house people who are viable citizens who aren't committing violent crimes, crimes against people."

The sentencing changes wouldn't take effect until July 2014, which would give legislators time next year to make changes to how specific crimes are classified, said Republican Sen. Brent Steele of Bedford, who helped develop the proposal.

"It is important we at least get this skeleton through before we start tightening the nuts and bolts down," Steele said. "This thing needs to just get through and then we'll leave next year for however people want to fight it out."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • We'll See
    Time for the conservative crowd to put up. My life is surrounded by perfectly legal things that "I'm mad at". The sooner we can exclude people from the web of the criminal-industrial justice complex, the sooner we can address real crime problems. We need to keep real violent offenders in prison for meaningful terms, and keep those we "don't like" out of our incredibly expensive court system.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Walgreens did not get a lot of traffic. It was not located on the corner of the intersection, and not really visible from Emerson. Meanwhile the CVS there is huge and right on the corner. I am guessing a lot of people drove by a million times and never knew the Walgreens was there. Although, with the new Walmart market going in, that area could really see a lot of increase in traffic soon.

  2. You folks don't have a clue. There is a legal way to enter this country and to get aid. This left unchecked could run us to ruin quickly. I also heard that 'supporters' were getting major $$ to take them in? Who's monitoring this and guess who pays the bill? I support charitable organizations... but this is NOT the way to do it!

  3. Apparently at some time before alcohol has been served at the fair. The problem is that beer or wine used to be a common drink for people before soft drinks and was not thought to be that unusual. Since many folks now only drink to see how much they can drink or what kind of condition they can end up in it becomes more problematic. Go to Europe and its no big deal just as if you had sodas of milk to drink everyday. Its using common sense that is lacking now days.

  4. To address the epic failure of attracting race fans to both the Indy 500 and Brickyard 400 would take too much of my time to write. Bottom line Boles is clueless and obviously totally out of touch with the real paying fan base. I see nothing but death spin coming for the Brickyard, just like Indy. Get somebody in a place of power that understands what race fans want.

  5. I am a race fan through & through. It doesn't matter if it's Indy cars or Nascar. I love a great race. I go to several other tracks each year and you can see the entire track. I know Indy has tradition, but fans want to see the entire race. I sit in the Penthouse, am almost 60 years old, and would like to see a better TV screen in turn 1 so you can see the entire race. Then I think Indy needs to install an escalator so us old folks can make it up to the Penthouse and down again if we want more options to purchase food and drinks. Just a race fans opinion. Lights won't make the race any better, but you might be able to see the TV better at night. Turn 1's screen needs replaced with a better and bigger screen.

ADVERTISEMENT