Indiana's Republican House leader on Tuesday promised swift movement on a push to make his state the first in more than
a decade to ban labor contracts that require employees to pay union fees.
Speaker Brian Bosma of Indianapolis told The Associated Press he is confident he can push the right-to-work bill through
his chamber during the 2012 session that begins Wednesday and is spending a lot "personal capital" to do so.
"We assume nothing," Bosma said. "I don't assume we have all the Republicans' votes. In fact, I know
I don't and I don't presume we don't have some Democrat votes, either."
Bosma, who has been the measure's most ardent supporter, said he hadn't yet taken a formal tally of supportive votes,
but added he "also wouldn't bring it forward if I wasn't confident of success."
The proposal would bar private employee unions from seeking contracts that mandate all workers pay union fees regardless
of whether they are members. Supporters say the law would help attract new business to the state. Opponents call it an attempt
to weaken organized labor.
Indiana's House Democrats successfully blocked the measure last year with a five-week walkout that denied House Republicans
the numbers needed to conduct daily business. Democratic leaders have so far declined to say whether they will walk out again
this session.
House Minority Leader Patrick Bauer, a Democrat from South Bend, called the quick rollout of the measure part of a strategy
to mute public dissent.
"They want to get it quickly done before the public knows what's been done to them," said Bauer, who led last
year's walkout.
If Bosma and other right-to-work supporters are successful this time around, they would hand national conservatives and business
groups a major win on an issue that has recently eluded them elsewhere. It also would deal another blow to organized labor,
which has seen mixed results in its fight against initiatives to curb union rights nationwide that followed Republican wins
in Statehouses across the country in 2010.
Indiana would become the 23rd state to enact a right-to-work law, but the first to do so since Oklahoma in 2001. More than
a dozen other states considered such legislation last year, but none managed to adopt the measure. New Hampshire lawmakers
came closest when they were able to pass a bill but couldn't find the votes needed to overturn a veto from Democratic
Gov. John Lynch.
Republicans hold wide margins in the Indiana Assembly: 60-40 in the House and 37-13 in the Senate, and Gov. Mitch Daniels
has come out with strong support for the measure.
"There's nowhere we are we closer than we are in Indianapolis," said Greg Mourad, vice president of the National
Right to Work Committee, which pushes the measure in Statehouse's across the country.
The group has maintained a state executive director to coordinate volunteer support for the measure over the last few years
and recently sent three or more new staff to shore up support in tough districts in Indiana.
The procedural push starts in earnest with a joint hearing of the House and Senate labor committees Friday, just two days
after lawmakers return for their 2012 session. But Bosma has been pushing the measure hard since the middle of November, when
he declared it would be his top legislative priority.
"We have a limited period of time to do a lot of work this session and the Super Bowl in the middle of the session complicates
it just a bit," Bosma said. "There's no time to sit around and wish that things were moving forward, we're
going to move them forward expeditiously."
This year's Super Bowl is Feb. 5 in Indianapolis, just a few blocks from the Statehouse.
Daniels said in a year-end interview last week that "right-to-work" should not be sped through the Assembly ahead
of the Super Bowl. A spokeswoman for the governor reiterated Tuesday that the only measure Daniels "sees as tied to the
Super Bowl" is human trafficking legislation.
Bosma calls right to work the "jobs bill" of the session, saying that it will attract new business to the state.
Like Daniels, he has gone up on the air with TV ads pitching the bill as a tool to combat the state's 9 percent unemployment
rate.
But the Indiana AFL-CIO is doing its own work running ads and targeting Republican lawmakers who could be vulnerable in the
2012 elections.
"This is a partisan smack at organized labor that is aimed to gut unions ... one of the last organizations standing
in the way of corporate control," said Jeff Harris, Indiana AFL-CIO spokesman.
Union members are expected to pack the Statehouse on the legislature's opening day, although new security rules put in
place by the Daniels administration could stem their presence.
Although the battle is likely to be fought primarily in the House, Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, said
the votes can't be taken for granted in his chamber.
Both Long and Bosma say they plan to move bills out of their respective chambers by a Feb. 1 filing deadline. The session
ends March 14.
"March 14 will come very quickly," he said.

















IBJ Conversations
10 Comments
Add Comment
Yes the same subject was present in the 60's, and many should know it is not new. The attempt by a few rich and the foolish want to be rich to hijack the rights of the American Workers to far wages and benefits will continue as long as there is not a STRONG VOICE HEARD from the majority who struggle everyday.
Just because one is a member of a "working family" doesn't mean they will be hurt if they do not have to pay dues -- it would just be voluntary. My father-in-law was in a union his whole career. He paid his dues but despised the union thugs telling him how to vote. This was Chicago and the threats, intimidation and violence are all well-documented.
There are a lot of ordinary folks who do not like the hard left turns the unions have taken. Why deny them employment if they refuse to subscribe to the union bosses decrees? Let them opt out.