IBJNews

Indiana House speaker weighing options over boycott

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Republican leader of the Indiana House said Tuesday his patience was wearing thin with boycotting Democratic legislators and that different strategies were being considered to end the impasse that has entered its fourth week.

Most Democrats skipped Tuesday's floor session as their walkout continues over Republican-backed proposals that they consider attacks on labor unions and public schools.

Last week, Republicans started imposing $250-a-day fines on the absent Democrats. But since that hasn't prompted any of them to break the boycott, House Speaker Brian Bosma raised the prospect of other action without giving any details.

"All options are on the table and I'm not going to speculate about what our decisions are going to be," Bosma told reporters.

Republicans, who hold a 60-40 House majority, don't have an option like Wisconsin legislators used last week to pass a collective bargaining bill despite a similar Democratic boycott. Indiana's constitution requires two-thirds of members to be present for the House or Senate to conduct business, and Bosma said there was no way around that provision.

Democrats have raised their most pointed objections to proposals allowing state vouchers to help parents send their children to private schools and changing the regulations covering wages and other matters for workers on government construction projects.

Republicans have proposed amendments to those bills that seem to, at least in part, address the concerns raised by Democrats.

Bosma said he told Democratic leader Patrick Bauer on Tuesday that Republican "accommodations aren't going to sit there forever."

Democrats, however, showed no signs of ending the walkout that began Feb. 22 when most of them left for Urbana, Ill.

Rep. Shelli VanDenburgh, D-Crown Point, said she and her fellow Democrats want to return but believe the public needs to learn more about the Republican proposals on education and workers' rights.

"Things were moving very quickly and I don't believe all voters were keeping themselves informed," she said.

The atmosphere surrounding the House chamber has calmed down from the start of the boycott when thousands of union members filled the Statehouse in protests and many Republican legislators spoke on the House floor, often lambasting the absent Democrats.

On Tuesday, a few dozen union protesters in the hallway outside the House cheered "Thank you Democrats" when Bosma announced the absence of a quorum. But the public gallery — previously packed with protesters — was about half filled with people, including several wearing Ivy Tech State College shirts during the school's lobbying day and a couple women with four grade school-aged children.

The only House members besides Bosma to speak from the floor microphones this week were those supporting a resolution honoring the contributions of Indiana National Guard members.

Democrats each day have two boycotting members present for parliamentary reasons, along with Rep. Steve Stemler, D-Jeffersonville, who didn't join the walkout.

This week, Bosma has stopped his previous practices of trying two or three times a day to call the House to order and having a clerk sometimes read each name for roll call.

But Bosma said it has cost more than $300,000 to run the House since the start of the walkout, which he calls "a very expensive tantrum by the Democrats."

Democratic Rep. Gregory Porter of Indianapolis said the boycotters remained resolute in wanting to negotiate changes to the Republican proposals before they return. He said he didn't believe the walkout had reached the point where the Legislature couldn't get its needed work completed by the late April deadline to adjourn.

"If we get the work done by the end of April, it doesn't matter what transpired in January or February," Porter said. "It's what happens at the end — and we have plenty of time to do the business by the end of April."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Recall Missing House Members
    Let the voters know the procedure to recall the missing house members since they are costing taxpayers lots of $$ that we don't have to waste. Either grow up and return to vote or give up the job!!!
  • Completely agree
    With companies jumping ship right and left, new housing construction at a record low, brain drain at a record high, it's no wonder Democrats left. Let the Republicans finish wrecking Indiana by themselves. Those of us with the means (and the diplomas) are leaving anyway. Ta ta!
    • Stolen Votes
      At this point the dems think that they can do anything and get away with it. If they don't want to stay in this state and work they need to resign, at this point they have stolen our voices in Indiana, "THEY NEED TO START IMPEACHMENT PROCESSES".
    • Boycot
      "$300,000 to run the House since the start of the walkout, which he calls "a very expensive tantrum by the Democrats" REALLY? I have never been more disgusted or embarassed as a Hoosier. Get to work or resign!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

    ADVERTISEMENT