IBJNews

Indiana House turns aside school guns proposal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House on Thursday pulled a proposal to have the state's public schools consider having employees, including teachers and principals, carry guns during school hours.

House members in a voice vote without dissent approved a Republican amendment that stripped mentions of the armed employees proposal from a bill on school security.

In its place, lawmakers added a proposal for a new state school safety board to review training and other issues surrounding the possibility of arming school staffers. The board would submit a report to the Legislature by Dec. 1.

Republican and Democratic legislators applauded after about three minutes of discussion on the amendment, which diffused an issue that first emerged last week when a House committee advanced a proposal that would have required all public schools, including charter schools, to have armed employees.

Another committee this week removed the mandate after Republican Gov. Mike Pence and other officials said they believed such decisions should be left to local school officials. Several legislators and education groups also raised questions about training standards and the appropriateness of having non-police officers carrying guns in schools.

The revised bill still would have authorized the armed employees and required local school boards to decide each year whether to take that step — until the Republican-controlled House backed away on Thursday.

Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, said he thought the proposal had been "moving very, very rapidly."

"We all want to do what's right and we all want to protect our kids, but we don't want to hurt someone with unintended consequences," Soliday said.

Democratic Rep. Linda Lawson, a retired Hammond police captain, had pleaded with the House Ways and Means Committee this week to reject the armed employee provisions because she was worried that teachers or others would be ineffective in responding to an attack.

Lawson extolled Thursday's move in the House. "We need to look at this bill thoroughly," she said.

Rep. Jim Lucas, R-Seymour, sponsored the armed employee provision in the House Education Committee last week, saying he was worried that most of Indiana's some 1,900 public schools are defenseless against attacks such as the December elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn., in which 20 students and six teachers were killed.

Lucas said after Thursday's vote that he was disappointed but would continue to advocate for the proposal.

"The good thing is we have everyone talking about it," he said. "Our goal is to find the best, most-cost effective way to ensure that our children and educators are safe."

The House is expected to vote Monday on the remaining provisions of the bill, which aims to start a state grant program to help school districts buy safety equipment and hire police officers who've undergone extra training on dealing with students to become school resource officers.

The Senate previously backed the grant program, and its budget proposal advanced this week includes $10 million for the program.

House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said the armed employees proposal faced many questions from legislators and the public in the past week.

"It pretty clear after we talked about it that the proper thing to do was to take a breath, take some time, look at the issue before we jumped headlong into the full-blown policy," Bosma said. "It was clear that a lot of education needed to be done before we moved forward."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT