IBJNews

Indiana House turns aside school guns proposal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana House on Thursday pulled a proposal to have the state's public schools consider having employees, including teachers and principals, carry guns during school hours.

House members in a voice vote without dissent approved a Republican amendment that stripped mentions of the armed employees proposal from a bill on school security.

In its place, lawmakers added a proposal for a new state school safety board to review training and other issues surrounding the possibility of arming school staffers. The board would submit a report to the Legislature by Dec. 1.

Republican and Democratic legislators applauded after about three minutes of discussion on the amendment, which diffused an issue that first emerged last week when a House committee advanced a proposal that would have required all public schools, including charter schools, to have armed employees.

Another committee this week removed the mandate after Republican Gov. Mike Pence and other officials said they believed such decisions should be left to local school officials. Several legislators and education groups also raised questions about training standards and the appropriateness of having non-police officers carrying guns in schools.

The revised bill still would have authorized the armed employees and required local school boards to decide each year whether to take that step — until the Republican-controlled House backed away on Thursday.

Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, said he thought the proposal had been "moving very, very rapidly."

"We all want to do what's right and we all want to protect our kids, but we don't want to hurt someone with unintended consequences," Soliday said.

Democratic Rep. Linda Lawson, a retired Hammond police captain, had pleaded with the House Ways and Means Committee this week to reject the armed employee provisions because she was worried that teachers or others would be ineffective in responding to an attack.

Lawson extolled Thursday's move in the House. "We need to look at this bill thoroughly," she said.

Rep. Jim Lucas, R-Seymour, sponsored the armed employee provision in the House Education Committee last week, saying he was worried that most of Indiana's some 1,900 public schools are defenseless against attacks such as the December elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn., in which 20 students and six teachers were killed.

Lucas said after Thursday's vote that he was disappointed but would continue to advocate for the proposal.

"The good thing is we have everyone talking about it," he said. "Our goal is to find the best, most-cost effective way to ensure that our children and educators are safe."

The House is expected to vote Monday on the remaining provisions of the bill, which aims to start a state grant program to help school districts buy safety equipment and hire police officers who've undergone extra training on dealing with students to become school resource officers.

The Senate previously backed the grant program, and its budget proposal advanced this week includes $10 million for the program.

House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said the armed employees proposal faced many questions from legislators and the public in the past week.

"It pretty clear after we talked about it that the proper thing to do was to take a breath, take some time, look at the issue before we jumped headlong into the full-blown policy," Bosma said. "It was clear that a lot of education needed to be done before we moved forward."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT