IBJNews

Indiana lawmakers back tighter cold meds limits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana House will consider stricter limits on purchases of cold and allergy pills that can be used to make methamphetamine after a committee endorsed them Wednesday, while rejecting even tougher measures sought by several mayors.

Officials from Evansville, Muncie, Terre Haute and other cities told the House criminal code committee about problems tied to meth production, including explosions and chemical spills caused by meth cookers. They argued for requiring people to have a doctor's prescription to buy pseudoephedrine-based products, which are often used to make meth.

Opponents said it would be unfair to force law-abiding people to pay for more doctor visits and likely higher drug costs.

Muncie Mayor Dennis Tyler told the committee that the city's police department spent more than 2,000 man-hours dealing with about 60 meth labs last year, with more costs to clean up dangerous chemicals and fire damage.

"It's a money issue," Tyler said. "The time's going to come, as this continues to rise, that we're not going to have the funds that we need to be able to do our job and protect our citizens."

Indiana has long been at the center of the national meth epidemic and had the third-most meth lab seizures of any state last year, with 1,429, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration.

Rep. Wendy McNamara, R-Mount Vernon, told the committee about a meth lab explosion that happened about a mile from her home in a rural area of southwestern Indiana. She said meth makers "have disregard for everybody in our communities. ... Our communities are asking for help."

The committee turned down a proposal from McNamara to allow individual cities and counties to decide whether to require doctor prescriptions for the pseudoephedrine-based medications.

Rep. Matt Pierce, D-Bloomington, said he worried that allowing such local laws would simply "shove the problem around" with meth makers heading to communities that didn't ban over-the-counter sales to obtain the medications.

The bill unanimously approved by the House committee would allow a consumer to buy up to 61 grams a year of ephedrine and pseudoephedrine. That's about an eight-month total, when compared to the current law's monthly limit of 7.2 grams.

The proposal also would require all stores selling medicines containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine to use a computerized system to track sales. A state law adopted two years ago requires pharmacies to use that tracking system, but convenience stores that sell only small packages are exempt.

The bill, approved last month by the state Senate, now goes to the full House for consideration.

Sen. Carlin Yoder, R-Middlebury, the bill's sponsor, said he didn't believe people with allergies and occasional illnesses should face the additional costs and hassles of getting prescriptions. He said he believed a bill that included a prescription requirement would be rejected by legislators.

Federal law requires stores to keep pseudoephedrine-based products behind the counter, and two states — Mississippi and Oregon — require a prescription.

Evansville Assistant Police Chief Chris Pugh told the committee that while a prescription requirement wouldn't stop the sale of meth imported from outside the country, it could put a dent in the some 100 meth labs a year discovered in the city. He said dealing with those labs means police officers aren't handling other problems.

"We're working hazmat, we're working explosions," Pugh said. "We're having to deal with the cleanup and all that cost."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • don't understand
    When i buy pseudoephedrine at Walgreens, i have to sign a form, provide ID, and they take my picture. How is anyone buying enough for a meth lab??

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT