Indiana liquor law could crimp Super Bowl parties

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rich Pontolillo might merit a toast for his Super Bowl party preparations. He has beer and liquor stocked up ahead of the first Super Bowl ever held in his home state.

In Indiana, he didn't have much choice about planning ahead: The state is among a handful that ban carryout liquor sales on Sundays, even with the NFL's most-celebrated spectacle on the schedule.

"It just requires some advance planning," shrugs Pontolillo, a 54-year-old remodeling contractor from Indy.

There was never much chance of getting Indiana's "blue law" suspended, just this once. A spokeswoman for Gov. Mitch Daniels, Jane Jankowski, said the issue was never raised and some of the city's business owners say they understand why.

"I'm not surprised at all," said Paul Thistle, general manager of the downtown Kahn's Fine Wines and Spirits and two other locations nearby. "If they waive it for this event, then they have to defend themselves for not waiving it at other events. It puts them in a difficult position."

The nation's few remaining blue laws are mostly in the South and Midwest and tend to limit liquor or car sales on Sundays. The name is believed to have derived either from 18th century usage of the word "blue" to disparage those with puritanical beliefs or from an early set of rules in New Haven, Conn., that were printed on blue paper.

Indiana restaurants and taverns can get permits to serve alcohol for on-premises consumption from 7 a.m. through the wee hours of the next day all week long, including Sundays. And nothing forbids anyone 21 or older from walking around outside with a beer or cocktail, prompting many Indy eateries to expand their outside seating onto adjacent parking lots and sidewalks in the run-up to Sunday night's game.

But state law bars liquor and convenience stores from selling carryout booze after 3 a.m. Sunday until 7 a.m. Monday, leaving Super Bowl revelers — perhaps out-of-towners not versed in all things Indiana — in the lurch if they go looking for an 11th-hour six-pack or bottle of wine on game day.

Thistle said many visiting fans already have placed orders. And he plans to close his businesses two hours later — at 1 a.m. — in the days preceding the Super Bowl, taking full advantage of an "uptick" in sales even before the big wave of out-of-state fans arrive.

"Business so far is probably double or triple what it normally is, and we expect the coming weekend to be better," he said.

As vice president of a company that has 22 liquor stores in Indianapolis, United Package Liquors' Brad Rider would have liked to see an exception made for Super Bowl Sunday. But he said he does not favor lifting the law altogether simply because it's not feasible to staff his stores to sell only a small list of products allowed by law, 10 items in all.

Far from Indy, one community is making a change.

With some 2,400 residents, Dillingham, Alaska, is lifting its ban on alcohol sales at its restaurants and bars for all Super Bowl Sundays going forward, though liquor stores will remain closed. The reprieve had been temporarily in place last year and proved trouble-free, prompting it to be made permanent last month in a town some 1,665 miles from the nearest NFL team — Seattle's Seahawks.

Back in Indiana, Rider figures the homestate Hoosiers — and their Super Bowl visitors — won't struggle finding spirits this Sunday, ban or no ban.

"Not at all," he says.


  • cold coke please
    Try buying a cold coke or pepsi from a liquor store. The state says you cant. ok i am for peeling back the sunday sales but also peel back the foolish laws that say you cant sell cold soft drinks at a liquor store. Talk about foolish.
  • Open sunday
    If you don't want to be open on Sunday, don't be open on Sunday. Why do private liquor stores need the govmt to step in to protect their profits? Seems everyone wants less govmt regulation, except where they benefit from it.
    • All about Money
      It's all about the $. The consumer is more likely to "over buy" alcohol on Saturday, boosting the sales for the liquor store owners. This extra revenue is great for the liquor store owner because they don't have to pay for staff and don't have to pay for the operating expenses of opening up on Sunday. Basically, they get all of Sunday's sales without the operation costs of opening up on Sunday.

      My question is this: how can the other 40+ states that allow the sale of carryout alcohol on Sunday, report liquor store profits on Sunday but the liquor store owners in Indiana can't turn a profit without the blue law?
      • Local Brews
        You can buy carryout liquor from Indy's best local micro-brews. Try Sun King or Fountain Square Brewery!!!!!
      • Write their own law
        "As vice president of a company that has 22 liquor stores in Indianapolis, United Package Liquors' Brad Rider would have liked to see an exception made for Super Bowl Sunday. But he said he does not favor lifting the law altogether simply because it's not feasible to staff his stores to sell only a small list of products allowed by law, 10 items in all"...
        well how convenient for him, we should base all our laws on the interests of a few businesses..
      • Nonsense
        Another reason the blue law should be repealed. It is ok to drink in a bar all day, or walk around with open liquor, but you can buy it in a store to take home? Why not ban Sunday tobacco sales?
        This is 2012, many people do their grocery shopping and other errands on Sunday.
      • Right To Work
        Suddenly I see the opportunity for hundreds of folks to make a few extra dollars on Sunday. Get your coolers filled with beer and wine coolers and get downtown on Sunday Morning. The more creative vendors should have an "On The Go Pack" that includes optional snack items. Come on IMPD, give these beer vendors a little slack.
      • One Day Pass
        This is where the State Legislator dropped the ball. All that was needed one a "One Day Pass" for Sunday, February 5th.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

      2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

      3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

      4. Exciting times in Carmel.

      5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1