IBJNews

Indiana moving ahead with plan to fix jobless fund

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Legislators aren't holding up a plan to fix Indiana's debt-ridden unemployment insurance fund as they wait to see whether the federal government will put off charging the states interest on what they owe.

The state Senate's tax committee voted 8-4 Thursday along party lines to advance a Republican proposal that would reduce jobless benefits for many recipients and soften tax increases on businesses in order to start paying off the $2 billion that Indiana has borrowed from the federal government.

The Obama administration this week proposed that Congress grant a two-year delay in charging states interest on unemployment fund debts with a plan under which employers could face higher taxes in 2014.

Indiana expects to owe about $80 million in interest this year, but Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels didn't seem interested in the interest delay.

"Not on the terms I've seen so far," Daniels told reporters Thursday. "It is another one of these short-term goodies, long-term cost things like they've proposed before. I don't think it's very attractive."

The plan backed by Daniels reduces business tax increases approved in 2009 that are taking effect this year. It also would revise how jobless benefits are calculated starting in July 2012 — a change estimated to mean a 25-percent reduction in the state's unemployment payments.

Mark Everson, commissioner of the Department of Workforce Development, told the committee that holding off on approving the changes would mean businesses paying millions more in extra taxes due this spring.

"It is irresponsible to take decisions or act based on what has already met with some skepticism," he said of the Obama proposal. "We haven't even seen the details.

Under the bill already approved by the House, the top payment to unemployed workers would stay at $390 a week. However, the method of calculating payments would now be based on total annual earnings rather than earnings during the highest-paid three months in the previous year.

That would, for instance, reduce payments to those in seasonal jobs, such as construction workers. Labor leaders estimate the average weekly payment would drop by about $70, to $212.

Everson said a delay in enacting the changes could upset a compromise that has employers shouldering about two-thirds of the burden of paying off the fund's debt.

State AFL-CIO President Nancy Guyott told the committee that the revised formula would leave Indiana with one of the worst unemployment benefits in the country and leave many struggling families unable to pay their bills and buy necessities.

"I ask you to be mindful of the real pain this bill could cause," she said.

Sen. Karen Tallian, D-Portage, said the bill's provisions were based on an unnecessary goal set by Republicans of paying off the debt by 2020.

The Legislature's session isn't yet at its halfway point, but the bill's Senate sponsor Phil Boots, R-Crawfordsville, said lawmakers needed to get the changes approved quickly so that businesses can know how much they'll owe on tax bills due in April.

"As soon as we can get them out, it will mitigate their concerns somewhat," Boots said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!

ADVERTISEMENT