IBJNews

Indiana panel moves toward audit of $500M in mistakes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indiana's state budget leaders on Monday are expected to take another step toward finding what caused more than $500 million in tax-revenue accounting errors, but a final answer is still a long way off.

Members of the State Budget Committee plan during a meeting in Vincennes to sign off on a company that will begin outlining an external audit for the state's Department of Revenue.

The review follows the disclosure in December that $320 million in corporate tax money collected over several years hadn't been properly deposited in the state's general fund. State officials then announced in April that $205 million in local income-tax revenue had been mishandled and not distributed over the previous 14 months to Indiana counties.

An initial review of the first error by the State Board of Accounts showed that the state lacked the auditing capabilities to have discovered the problem on its own. Since then, Republican legislators agreed to an external audit.

That agreement marked something of a vindication for Democrats, who tried twice during a December budget committee meeting to authorize an external audit but were voted down both times, 3-2.

The start of the actual audit could still be up to six weeks away after the company being hired Monday establishes the review's scope.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate John Gregg has called on the state to speed up the process. But leaders of the budget committee say they are moving as fast as they can.

"This audit is a major undertaking, and one that must be done right," said Republican Rep. Jeff Espich, the committee's chairman. "Time is of the essence, but there is no benefit — only pitfalls — to rushing unnecessarily."

State budget director Adam Horst, an appointee of Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels, cautioned at the committee's April meeting that more errors will likely be uncovered but said he wasn't ready to disclose them.

The budget committee, made up of two Republican and two Democratic legislators and Horst, is meeting at Vincennes University.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • No Shell Games
    To be crediable the scope of the audit needs to cover all state government, not just the Indiana Department of Revenue, include a broad financial/computer/process analysis that would identify red flags for further study and recommended changes.

    A commercial outside accounting firm has fiduary responsibilities for accuracy in addition to legal liability for its work. Obviously the public sector financial checks and balances system is badly broken and needs major reform.
  • Ratings Matter
    The independant state audit by an outside accounting firm needs to be directed by Tim Berry, the elected State Auditor and work should begin within 30 days.

    The firm preferably would be a large international accounting firm with public finance experience, yet no major connection with Indiana government.

    It is ridiculous to have OMB's Adam Horst in charge of checking his own work after being caught cheating more than once.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT