IBJNews

Indiana redistricting plan appears to benefit GOP

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The northern Indiana congressional district that Democrat Joe Donnelly narrowly held onto in last year's election is on its way to taking a more Republican tilt.

Republicans who control the Indiana General Assembly on Monday released proposed new maps for the state's nine congressional and 150 legislative districts, which seem to point toward solidifying GOP gains in the Statehouse.

The congressional map puts all of Elkhart County and much of Kosciusko County — both heavily Republican — into Donnelly's current 2nd congressional district and removes part of Democratic-leaning LaPorte County and all of Kokomo.

Donnelly has been considering whether to run for the U.S. Senate or governor because of expected changes in his district. The third-term congressman said in a statement Monday he believed politics was involved in the redistricting and he would decide his next political step in the coming weeks.

"Clearly those are politically motivated lines there that have been moved," said Sen. Tim Lanane of Anderson, the top Democrat on the Senate Elections Committee. "This was something that we feared might happen, particularly with Representative Donnelly's district."

The congressional map also would extend what has been a swing district won last year by Republican Todd Young over then-Democratic Rep. Baron Hill further north to include all of heavily GOP Johnson County just south of Indianapolis. The 9th district starts in the Ohio River counties near Louisville, Ky.

The proposal also would give southern Indiana's 8th district, which switched parties last year with Republican Larry Bucshon's win, more of the counties along the Ohio River east of Evansville.

Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, said the proposed congressional districts are more compact and more representative than those drawn by Democrats when they controlled redistricting in 2001.

Long said political considerations weren't as important as keeping counties together, and he expected the districts now held by Donnelly, Bucshon and Young to remain competitive.

"We've tried out best to keep counties intact where we can," he said.

Nine of the state's 92 counties would be divided between two congressional districts under the Senate committee plan. The other 83 would be single-district counties.

Indiana's six other congressional districts appear likely to remain in their partisan camps — four Republican and two Democratic.

The state could see an open seat in the 6th district if current Republican Rep. Mike Pence makes his anticipated run to replace term-limited Gov. Mitch Daniels. The redistricting plan would shift that district to the south, with it stretching from the Muncie area to four counties along the Ohio River.

The legislative redistricting plans, which Republican leaders expect to approve by the session's scheduled April 29 finish, has Democrats facing difficult prospects on several fronts.

The House plan has three districts that put two current Republican legislators together, three districts with at least two Democrats and four districts with a Republican and a Democratic incumbent.

That also results in eight new districts among the 100 House seats without an incumbent. All those appear to be in predominantly Republican areas — three in suburban Indianapolis, one in suburban Lake County, three in rural northern Indiana and one in rural southeastern Indiana.

Democrats — outnumbered 60-40 in the House after losing their majority in last November's election — said five of their House members from Indianapolis were drawn into just two districts

"I really am beyond words. I don't know what to say," said Rep. Vanessa Summers, who was put in the same Indianapolis district as another Democrat. "This is just another disturbing, radical situation that we find ourselves in."

Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma said the intent of the redistricting plan was to make compact districts that kept counties, cities and school districts together as much as possible — not to protect or target any particular members.

"It wasn't our goal to draw a political map," Bosma said. "I can't tell you a single statistic on it."

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jeff Espich, R-Uniondale, was drawn into a district with Republican Rep. Dan Leonard of Huntington, but said he planned to run again for his 21st two-year term.

Espich said he wasn't aware of the situation until he saw the map on Monday but he knew there would be significant changes to districts in rural northeastern Indiana because of population losses.

"It just so happened that to a great extent it was my home county," Espich said.

Democratic Rep. Ed DeLaney of Indianapolis said he doubted the new map would lead to competitive elections.

"From what I can tell, some nests were very nicely feathered," DeLaney said. "We've been shut out of this process completely and it'll take us at least a few hours if not a few days to sort out exactly what's going on."

The proposed map for the 50 Senate districts doesn't put any incumbents in the same districts, Senate leaders said. Republicans now have a commanding 37-13 majority in the Senate, which they've controlled since the mid-1970s.

The House and Senate election committees scheduled public hearings on the redistricting plans for Wednesday.

"There isn't much time for the public to weigh in on this," said Julia Vaughn, policy director for the government watchdog group Common Cause/Indiana.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • self-preservation
    Don't let any of these politicians lie to you. Re-drawing the district lines is solely a self-preservation tactic. Why do you think it's so hard to oust an incumbant? The game is rigged.
  • Works for me
    Just hand this joke of a state over to the GOP. Then, when it's completely, instead of just mostly, full of overweight, uneducated, unemployed homophobes with nothing to their names but their cigarettes and their guns, there will be no doubt about the "success" of the GOP agenda. Mazel tov.
  • 6 seats needed
    I'm glad to see this re-districting. Hopefully this will be just enough re-disctricting to get the 6 more GOP seats that are needed for a quorum and THEN the republicans can do all those things they have promised us but werr prevented by "vacationing" democrats.
  • redistricting
    so if they put us under the GOP isnt that whats messing up our government now? it seems all those in office now; dont back there words anyway. they all promise this and that but dont deliver as they promised when there elected. so im hoping next election time we get some new elected faces!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT