Republican frustration over the five-week walkout by Indiana House Democrats re-emerged Wednesday as the state Senate approved
a method for $1,000-a-day fines against boycotting legislators.
The action threatened the calm that has existed in the House since the Democrats returned March 28, with the Democratic leader
saying he wasn't sure how his members would respond and that he believed such fines could violate the state constitution.
The Senate voted 36-0 to add the provision to the state budget bill after Democratic senators left the floor in protest.
The measure would allow a resident of a boycotting legislator's district to ask a judge to fine lawmakers who were unexcused
for three or more days in order to leave too few members present to conduct business.
Senate President Pro Tem David Long said the provision was needed to prevent such boycotts from becoming a regular tactic
by legislators.
"It has set a terrible example, in my opinion, to the rest of the nation," Long said. "It cannot be allowed
to occur."
Most House Democrats spent five weeks in Urbana, Ill., to protest education- and labor-related bills backed by majority Republicans,
leaving the House with too few members to conduct official business.
Republicans imposed $250-a-day fines against the absent Democrats two weeks into the boycott and increased the fines to $350
for the final week. Those fines topped $3,000 for most of the Democrats.
House Democratic leader Patrick Bauer said soon after the Senate vote that he would have to meet with his members before
deciding what action they would take and that he didn't know whether another walkout was possible with just more than
a week remaining before the Legislature's April 29 adjournment deadline.
Bauer said Republicans were "out of whack."
"They've gone to such a radical extreme that some of these punitive measures that they try to dream up are more
important to them than people having jobs, people putting food on the table," Bauer said. "I think the constitution
would override their pouting and shouting."
Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma suggested during the Democratic boycott that he was considering reviving an 1867 state
law repealed in the 1970s that made it a misdemeanor with $1,000 fines for legislators to intentionally break quorum. Under
the state constitution, two-thirds of legislators must be present to conduct business.
Bosma said Wednesday he hadn't advised senators on whether to proceed with the provision and wouldn't commit to supporting
it.
"It might scratch a few scabs open and that's maybe not the best thing right now," Bosma said. "But we
have had a lot of input from citizens over the last three months that they think some revision to the law or constitution
is appropriate. If I were to pick one, I would say this is the most advisable one."
Republican Sen. Michael Young of Indianapolis, who sponsored the provision, said legislators were obligated by their oath
to debate and vote on the issues.
"If I don't show up, fine me whatever it takes to get me to show up and do my job," Young said.
Democratic Sen. John Broden of South Bend told Republicans that the measure would damage the state constitutional rights
of minority party legislators.
"There may be a time when the tables are turned and these unique tools of the minority party may be something that you
might wish that you had not done away with so summarily," he said.

















IBJ Conversations
12 Comments
Add Comment
Reviving an 1867 state law? Is that really where we're at today Mr. Bosma?
Section 10. Each House, when assembled, shall choose its own officers, the President of the Senate excepted; judge the elections, qualifications, and returns of its own members; determine its rules of proceeding, and sit upon its own adjournment. BUT NEITHER HOUSE SHALL, WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE OTHER, ADJOURN FOR MORE THAN THREE DAYS, nor to any place other than that in which it may be sitting.
Section 11. Two-thirds of each House shall constitute a quorum to do business; but a smaller number may meet, adjourn from day to day, AND COMPEL THE ATTENDANCE OF ABSENT MEMBERS. A quorum being in attendance, if either House fail to effect an organization within the first five days thereafter, the members of the House so failing, shall be entitled to no compensation, from the end of the said five days until an organization shall have been effected.
I think that's pretty clear Bauer. Read the Constitution.