IBJNews

Indiana Supreme Court back to work with new leader

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court will return to work this week with a new leader for the first time in 25 years.

When the court next hears oral arguments on Wednesday, Brent Dickson will preside as the acting chief justice following the retirement of longtime Chief Justice Randall Shepard. Dickson, 70, takes over the top judge spot as the longest-serving justice until the Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission picks a new chief justice from among the court's five members.

Dickson, who grew up in northwestern Indiana's Hobart, was an attorney in Lafayette when Republican Gov. Robert Orr appointed him to the Supreme Court in 1986.

Dickson's work on the Supreme Court has included rulings that led to a complete restructuring of Indiana's property-tax system, The Times of Munster reported.

Lake County Judge John Pera said Dickson has led efforts to reform jury service, improve court technology and better the relationship between trial court judges and the appellate courts.

"I know that under his leadership the court is going to be held in high esteem throughout the state," Pera said.

Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels on Friday named Mark Massa to fill the vacancy created by Shepard's retirement. Massa, 50, was chief counsel to Daniels in the governor's office from 2006 to 2010, when he resigned for an unsuccessful run as the Republican candidate for Marion County prosecutor.

A date hasn't yet been set for when Massa will formally join the Supreme Court, which will conduct its work with four justices until then, court spokeswoman Kathryn Dolan said Monday.

Shepard, 65, isn't completely retiring after 27 years at the Supreme Court — all but two years as chief justice. He will tackle occasional cases as a senior judge on the Indiana Court of Appeals and maintain an office across the street from the Statehouse, the Evansville Courier & Press reported.

Shepard said his plans include teaching law school classes, possibly at Indiana University and his law school alma mater, Yale University, along with traveling to Bloomington to work on the Indiana Magazine of History ahead of the state's bicentennial in 2016 and serving on national judicial groups.

"Part of the motivation for leaving when I am leaving is that I'm still young enough and healthy enough to try some other things," he said, "and experience new places and projects and people — not retiring, so to speak."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT