IBJNews

Indiana Supreme Court back to work with new leader

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court will return to work this week with a new leader for the first time in 25 years.

When the court next hears oral arguments on Wednesday, Brent Dickson will preside as the acting chief justice following the retirement of longtime Chief Justice Randall Shepard. Dickson, 70, takes over the top judge spot as the longest-serving justice until the Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission picks a new chief justice from among the court's five members.

Dickson, who grew up in northwestern Indiana's Hobart, was an attorney in Lafayette when Republican Gov. Robert Orr appointed him to the Supreme Court in 1986.

Dickson's work on the Supreme Court has included rulings that led to a complete restructuring of Indiana's property-tax system, The Times of Munster reported.

Lake County Judge John Pera said Dickson has led efforts to reform jury service, improve court technology and better the relationship between trial court judges and the appellate courts.

"I know that under his leadership the court is going to be held in high esteem throughout the state," Pera said.

Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels on Friday named Mark Massa to fill the vacancy created by Shepard's retirement. Massa, 50, was chief counsel to Daniels in the governor's office from 2006 to 2010, when he resigned for an unsuccessful run as the Republican candidate for Marion County prosecutor.

A date hasn't yet been set for when Massa will formally join the Supreme Court, which will conduct its work with four justices until then, court spokeswoman Kathryn Dolan said Monday.

Shepard, 65, isn't completely retiring after 27 years at the Supreme Court — all but two years as chief justice. He will tackle occasional cases as a senior judge on the Indiana Court of Appeals and maintain an office across the street from the Statehouse, the Evansville Courier & Press reported.

Shepard said his plans include teaching law school classes, possibly at Indiana University and his law school alma mater, Yale University, along with traveling to Bloomington to work on the Indiana Magazine of History ahead of the state's bicentennial in 2016 and serving on national judicial groups.

"Part of the motivation for leaving when I am leaving is that I'm still young enough and healthy enough to try some other things," he said, "and experience new places and projects and people — not retiring, so to speak."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT