Indiana tea party groups look to endorse Lugar foe

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A coalition of Indiana tea party groups is planning a statewide convention this month that will culminate with them endorsing a candidate to run against Sen. Richard Lugar, an organizer said.

The tea party meeting is set for Sept. 24 in Greenfield, with those attending voting in a straw poll of Senate candidates for the 2012 Republican primary election.

Each preregistered tea party group in the state will be allowed to have two voting representatives at the meeting, said Monica Boyer of Warsaw, who is a tea party organizer and co-chairwoman of Hoosiers for Conservative Senate.

The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne reported Wednesday that Boyer said Lugar hasn't responded to the group's questionnaire, while state Treasurer Richard Mourdock "has enthusiastically agreed to participate."

Nine representatives of Hoosiers for Conservative Senate — one from each of Indiana's congressional district — will decide on a candidate endorsement after the straw-poll vote.

Indiana tea party activists attending a January meeting signed a letter asking Lugar to not seek a seventh term.

Mourdock is the only other Republican who has entered the race against Lugar, and he has actively sought the backing of tea party supporters.

Rep. Joe Donnelly is the only announced Democratic candidate for the Senate seat that Lugar first won in 1976.

The Hoosiers for Conservative Senate group has criticized Lugar on issues such as his support for the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors, or DREAM,  Act, which would help some illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children obtain citizenship, and his votes in favor of President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominations.


  • Lincoln said it best...
    We should look to the grandest of GOP Presidents for advice. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." Lincoln said it best.
  • Shooting themselves in the foot
    What perfect way for the Tea Party to look like the fools they are. The one guy who seems to draw support from both parties is too popular for the them. Just shows how much of a fringe organization they really are.
  • The Tea Party is the worse thing for the GOP
    The GOP (Grand?---that is doubtful) should be very against the Tea Party part of their party. We have to defeat them somehow-anyway-and soon.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

    2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

    3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

    4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

    5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.