Indiana tea party groups look to endorse Lugar foe

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A coalition of Indiana tea party groups is planning a statewide convention this month that will culminate with them endorsing a candidate to run against Sen. Richard Lugar, an organizer said.

The tea party meeting is set for Sept. 24 in Greenfield, with those attending voting in a straw poll of Senate candidates for the 2012 Republican primary election.

Each preregistered tea party group in the state will be allowed to have two voting representatives at the meeting, said Monica Boyer of Warsaw, who is a tea party organizer and co-chairwoman of Hoosiers for Conservative Senate.

The Journal Gazette of Fort Wayne reported Wednesday that Boyer said Lugar hasn't responded to the group's questionnaire, while state Treasurer Richard Mourdock "has enthusiastically agreed to participate."

Nine representatives of Hoosiers for Conservative Senate — one from each of Indiana's congressional district — will decide on a candidate endorsement after the straw-poll vote.

Indiana tea party activists attending a January meeting signed a letter asking Lugar to not seek a seventh term.

Mourdock is the only other Republican who has entered the race against Lugar, and he has actively sought the backing of tea party supporters.

Rep. Joe Donnelly is the only announced Democratic candidate for the Senate seat that Lugar first won in 1976.

The Hoosiers for Conservative Senate group has criticized Lugar on issues such as his support for the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors, or DREAM,  Act, which would help some illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children obtain citizenship, and his votes in favor of President Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominations.


  • Lincoln said it best...
    We should look to the grandest of GOP Presidents for advice. "A house divided against itself cannot stand." Lincoln said it best.
  • Shooting themselves in the foot
    What perfect way for the Tea Party to look like the fools they are. The one guy who seems to draw support from both parties is too popular for the them. Just shows how much of a fringe organization they really are.
  • The Tea Party is the worse thing for the GOP
    The GOP (Grand?---that is doubtful) should be very against the Tea Party part of their party. We have to defeat them somehow-anyway-and soon.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.