Indiana wineries, breweries to be featured at State Fair

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana beers and wines will be served at the State Fair this year under legislation Gov. Mike Pence signed into law last week.

Indiana State Fair Public Relations Director Andy Klotz said there is no concrete plan yet for how the alcohol sales will work, but there will be a separate area where the alcohol must be consumed. He said that should eliminate the risk of underage consumption.

“What is for sure is that there will be one beer and wine exhibit area, and it will be a 21-and-over area, so you must have a valid ID to get in,” Klotz said. “The alcohol that is served there will stay in that area and not leave that area”.

He said the practice has been used at all of the other year-round events held at the fairgrounds, and they have encountered very few problems in the past.

Klotz said the main focus will be to promote Indiana beer and wine. But he said he is not sure yet if it will be exclusively Indiana alcohol sold due to legal issues.

“It is certainly the intent to allow local growers to tell their stories and have their products available for sampling,” Klotz said.

He said local brewers have been contacted and informed about the new law and opportunity, however the logistics haven’t been figured out yet between the State Fair and brewers.

Jeanette Merritt , marketing director of Indiana Wines & the Purdue Wine Grape Team, said her company is thrilled to have the opportunity to be represented at the State Fair.

“The State Fair is a celebration of Indiana’s agricultural industry. Having Indiana wine available at the Indiana State Fair solidifies our industry as part of Indiana agriculture,” Merritt said. “I am thrilled that we will be represented and able to educate people on the grapes planted and the wines made from those grapes”.

“This really is a growing part of Indiana’s Ag-economy over the last 10 to 20 years, and that’s what this fair is all about; celebrating Indiana’s agriculture,” Klotz said.

Klotz said that he hopes featuring brewers will help give the industry exposure and raise sales for both the brewers and the fair.

“We don’t hide the fact that this could provide us with another revenue stream. This is a very large fair and it continues to grow, and it doesn’t get put on for free,” he said. “So everything we make, all of our profits go back into the facilities and the event, so it’s necessary to continue to find revenue streams in order to maintain the fair at that prestige level that it really is right now.”


  • Honest!
    To "Honest To Goodness Hoosier..." I appreciate your comments very much. You're right, this will only bring in the wrong sorts: people with something in mind other than seein' them thar pigs and them thar cows and laughing and pointing at the them thar various genitalia..." Oh, well, such is life. Personally, I think this is primarily a good idea: but, is it really a good idea to mix beer and wine drinkers in one, likely to be small, fenced-in area? Won't one kill the other?
  • End of the fair... and civilization
    By golly, the devil's drink being sold at the State Fair! I knew this day would come. Probably those hipster Twitter kids causin a ruckus. Next thing you know they'll let the womenfolk vote for President.
  • Good
    I think this can only be a good thing for the Fair. It is definitely another revenue stream, and anyone who doesn't understand that is being way too much of a polyanna about how much it takes to put on an event like this. Plus, I highly doubt there is anyone who is going to go to the Fair for the express reason to get wasted. There are far cheaper ways to do it, and if they do, then they'll be handled just like they are anywhere else.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.