IBJNews

Indianapolis Colts owner Irsay appears in Toyota TV commercial

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
On The Beat Industry News In Brief

In a television commercial that begins airing early this month, Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay takes on the unusual role of pitchman.

Irsay agreed to appear in television commercials for Toyota Motor Corp., which took over as the official automobile of the Colts from Chevrolet last year.

The TV ads are being launched as the Japanese car maker tries to recover from the public relations hit it took following a massive recall earlier this year. Federal safety regulators announced April 6 that they intend to fine Toyota $16.4 million—the largest ever penalty against an automaker—for failing to disclose problems with sticky accelerator pedals quickly.

The new TV commercials were produced by Saatchi & Saatchi, a worldwide ad agency that handles the Toyota account.

IMS Production in Speedway was used to shoot the ads. Much of the shoot took place at the Colts’ 56th Street complex.

Irsay appears in a Toyota vehicle along with Colts cheerleaders and the team’s mascot and says, “At the Indianapolis Colts, there’s only one car brand we trust to haul all our MVPs.”

It’s one of few direct pitches Irsay has ever made, though he’s generally willing to do what sponsors ask of him.

“Jim has made himself available to Colts sponsors at their will,” said Colts Senior Vice President Peter Ward. “We certainly want to do what we can to help our corporate partners.

According to Ward, officials for Toyota, which signed a three-year deal with the Colts at the beginning of last season, requested either a player or a high-ranking Colts executive for the ad, and the Colts offered Irsay.

The 30-second spot, which will air across Indiana through at least May, might also prove to be a good branding tool for the Colts.

In the commercial, the Colts mascot is shown with a large horseshoe prominently displayed on his chest, a horseshoe appears on one of the goal posts in the team’s training center, and the team’s playoff and Super Bowl banners are shown in the background of the ad.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT