IBJNews

Indianapolis officials used Super Bowl to prep for 2012

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

 Indianapolis officials say they're drawing on lessons learned while visiting Miami for this year's Super Bowl as they prepare to host the big game in 2012.

"The eyes of the world have never been on Indianapolis the way they are going to be for the Super Bowl," said Allison Melangton, president and CEO of the 2012 Indianapolis Super Bowl Host Committee. "We have to take advantage of that, and we have to be ready for it."

Nearly four dozen host committee members and Indianapolis officials pored over details and soaked in the big picture during the Super Bowl, which the Indianapolis Colts lost to the New Orleans Saints.

Melangton said members were struck by the number of activities taking place outside of National Football League-sanctioned events, including a Reebok shoe launch, an event for the Clinton Bush Haiti Fund and a music and food festival that attracted celebrities and revelers.

"Probably my biggest takeaway from Florida is that I need to get my arms around all those things," Melangton said. "We need to be on the offensive, to go to those companies and get that information. It's not in a book anywhere to say these are all the events that happen at the Super Bowl, because they change so much."

She said it's time now to start planning everything from airport welcomes and transportation to fostering partnerships with community groups.

"For the last year, we did a lot of what I call 'demystifying,' trying to collect information," she said. "This year, our whole year will be spent on concrete planning. We've gathered our information, now we're going to sit down and make a plan."

Kit Sawers, vice president of special events for the North Texas Super Bowl XLV Host Committee, says Indianapolis is on the right track with its timing. Dallas will host the 2011 game at Cowboys Stadium.

He said attention will quickly focus on Indianapolis once next year's Super Bowl is played.

"They're not going to be able hide behind the next game anymore," said Sawers. "All of a sudden, all of the attention is on you, and the floodgates open."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT